Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-120 Topic 11 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 11
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You are designing an SAP HANA deployment.

You estimate that the database will be 1.8 TB in three years.

You need to ensure that the deployment supports 60,000 IOPS. The solution must minimize costs and provide the lowest latency possible.

Which type of disk should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kip
3 months ago
That's true, but we need to prioritize performance and latency over cost in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
3 months ago
But wouldn't Ultra disk be more cost-effective in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
3 months ago
I agree with Kip, Premium SSD will provide the lowest latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
3 months ago
I'm just imagining the database administrator trying to fit 1.8 TB of data on a standard HDD. Talk about a 'standard' nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
3 months ago
I bet the 'ultra' in 'Ultra disk' stands for 'ultra expensive'. Premium SSD is probably the best combo of performance and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
Kara
2 months ago
D) Standard SSD
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 months ago
C) Ultra disk
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 months ago
B) Premium SSD
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
2 months ago
A) Standard HDD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
3 months ago
Standard HDD? Are you kidding me? That's way too slow for 60,000 IOPS. This is a serious database, not a grandma's photo album!
upvoted 0 times
Shaunna
2 months ago
C) Ultra disk
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
Exactly, Premium SSD would be the best option for high IOPS and low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
B) Premium SSD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heidy
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Ultra disk sounds really high-performance, but it might be overkill and super expensive. Maybe Standard SSD is a good balance?
upvoted 0 times
Terina
3 months ago
Yeah, Ultra disk might be too expensive for our needs. Standard SSD sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
I think Standard SSD could be a good balance of performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kip
3 months ago
I think we should go with Premium SSD for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
3 months ago
I think Premium SSD is the way to go. It provides the high IOPS and low latency needed, and the cost is worth it for a critical database like this.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
2 months ago
I think Premium SSD is the best choice for this critical database deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 months ago
Premium SSD is definitely the way to go for high performance and low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
2 months ago
I agree, Premium SSD is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
2 months ago
D) Standard SSD
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
2 months ago
C) Ultra disk
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
B) Premium SSD
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
A) Standard HDD
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77