Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-120 Topic 12 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 12
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You have an SAP landscape on Azure that contains the virtual machines shown in the following table.

You need to ensure that the Application Server role is available if a single Azure datacenter fails.

What should you include in the solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Margarita
2 months ago
I'd say Azure Load Balancer Standard is the clear winner here. It's designed to handle high availability and failover like a champ.
upvoted 0 times
Domitila
9 days ago
Fair enough, let's go with Azure Load Balancer Standard to ensure high availability in case of a datacenter failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
17 days ago
I see your point, but I still think Azure Load Balancer Standard is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 months ago
But don't you think Azure Application Gateway v1 could also be a good option for ensuring the Application Server role is available?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
1 months ago
I agree, Azure Load Balancer Standard is definitely the way to go for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
2 months ago
Haha, a local network gateway? Really? That's like bringing a knife to a gun fight. Azure's got much better options for this kind of set up.
upvoted 0 times
Terry
1 months ago
C) Azure Private Link
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 months ago
B) Azure Application Gateway v1
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 months ago
A) Azure Load Balancer Standard
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Shouldn't we be looking at something like Application Gateway v2 instead? It offers more advanced load balancing features.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
1 months ago
User4: I'm not convinced. We should consider Azure Application Gateway v2 instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 months ago
User3: What about Azure Application Gateway v1? It might provide more advanced load balancing features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 months ago
User 3: What about Azure Application Gateway v1? It might offer more advanced load balancing features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
1 months ago
I agree, it will help ensure the Application Server role is available if a single Azure datacenter fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
1 months ago
I agree, it can help ensure the Application Server role is available if a single Azure datacenter fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
2 months ago
I think we should consider Azure Load Balancer Standard for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I think we should go with Azure Load Balancer Standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marta
2 months ago
I'm not sure about Azure Load Balancer Standard. I think Azure Application Gateway v1 might be a better option for handling web traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
3 months ago
I agree with Scot. Azure Load Balancer Standard can help distribute traffic and ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
I agree with Dante. Load Balancer Standard is the perfect solution to handle the failover scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
3 months ago
I think we should include Azure Load Balancer Standard in the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
3 months ago
Azure Load Balancer Standard is the way to go. It can distribute incoming traffic across multiple VMs and ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Queen
1 months ago
D: We should definitely include Azure Load Balancer Standard in the solution to handle any datacenter failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
1 months ago
C: Azure Load Balancer Standard is a reliable solution for maintaining the Application Server role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
1 months ago
B: I agree, it can distribute traffic across multiple VMs to prevent any downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
2 months ago
A: Azure Load Balancer Standard is definitely the best option for ensuring high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77