Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-120 Topic 7 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 7
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You are planning a highly available SAP HANA deployment on Azure virtual machines.

You need to recommend a solution for monitoring TCP latency between the SAP application and the database tiers on the TCP socket layer.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jose
2 months ago
I hope the answer isn't D, because that would be a real PING-pong match with the wrong solution!
upvoted 0 times
Dortha
30 days ago
C) the NIPING command
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
B) Azure Extension for SAP
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
1 months ago
A) the Azure Network Watcher reachability report
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elke
2 months ago
The Azure Extension for SAP sounds like a convenient all-in-one solution. I bet it has some cool monitoring features built-in.
upvoted 0 times
Brittney
1 months ago
D) the PING command
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
1 months ago
C) the NIPING command
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
1 months ago
B) Azure Extension for SAP
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
A) the Azure Network Watcher reachability report
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
I'm not sure the PING command is the right choice here. It doesn't really give us the kind of network-level visibility we need for a highly available SAP HANA deployment.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
2 months ago
C) the NIPING command
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
2 months ago
B) Azure Extension for SAP
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
2 months ago
A) the Azure Network Watcher reachability report
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
3 months ago
The NIPING command sounds interesting. I wonder if it can give us more granular information on the TCP socket layer than the regular PING command.
upvoted 0 times
Tamekia
2 months ago
That's a good point, combining both options could give us a comprehensive view of the TCP latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
2 months ago
Have you considered using the Azure Network Watcher reachability report as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
I agree, it can provide more detailed information compared to the PING command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 months ago
I think the NIPING command is a good option for monitoring TCP latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irving
3 months ago
I also think we should consider using the NIPING command for monitoring TCP latency. It can give us more specific data for SAP HANA deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
3 months ago
I agree with Leslee. The Azure Network Watcher reachability report can provide detailed insights into the TCP latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
3 months ago
I think the Azure Network Watcher reachability report would be the best option here. It can provide detailed insights into network latency and connectivity between the application and database tiers.
upvoted 0 times
Krissy
2 months ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslee
3 months ago
I think we should include the Azure Network Watcher reachability report for monitoring TCP latency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77