Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-400 Topic 2 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 2
[All AZ-400 Questions]

SIMULATION

Task 5

You plan to stoic signed images in an Azure Container Registry instance named az40038443478act1.

You need to modify the SKU for az40038443478aa1 to support the planned images. The solution must minimize costs.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To store signed images in an Azure Container Registry (ACR) instance and support your planned images while minimizing costs, you need to modify the SKU of your ACR instance to one that supports content trust and image signing. Here's how you can do it:

Determine the Appropriate SKU:

Content trust and image signing are features of the Premium service tier of Azure Container Registry1.

If cost minimization is a priority, ensure that the Premium tier is necessary for your use case. If you require content trust, the Premium tier is the appropriate choice.

Modify the SKU of the ACR Instance:

Navigate to the Azure Portal.

Go to your ACR instance az40038443478act1.

Select Update from the overview pane.

Choose the Premium SKU from the SKU drop-down menu2.

Review the changes and pricing, then save the configuration.

By upgrading to the Premium SKU, you'll be able to store signed images in your ACR instance. Remember to monitor your usage and costs to ensure they align with your budget and requirements.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lacresha
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I bet the 'Free' SKU is the right answer. That's the way to go if you're on a tight budget!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 months ago
The 'Basic' SKU sounds like a good balance between cost and functionality. As long as your image storage needs aren't too crazy, it should get the job done.
upvoted 0 times
German
26 days ago
I've used the 'Basic' SKU before and it worked well for me. It's a solid option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
28 days ago
Yeah, I think it's a good choice to minimize costs while still meeting our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
I agree, the 'Basic' SKU seems like a cost-effective option for storing signed images.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consider other options as well before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
I agree with Dorothy. Basic SKU is the most cost-effective option for storing signed images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
2 months ago
I'd recommend the 'Premium' SKU. It offers the best features and scalability, even if it's a bit pricier. You don't want to skimp on your container registry, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
1 months ago
Premium SKU it is then, let's not compromise on quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's worth the extra cost for better features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
2 months ago
I think Premium SKU is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frank
3 months ago
Hmm, going with the 'Basic' SKU might be the most cost-effective option. Though if you're planning to store a lot of images, the 'Standard' SKU might be worth considering for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
3 months ago
I think we should use the Basic SKU for the Azure Container Registry to minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77