Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-400 Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-400 Questions]

You have a project in Azure DevOps named Project1 that contains two environments named environment1 and envkonment2.

When a new version of Project1 is released, the latest version is deployed to environment2, and the previous version is redeployed to environments

You need to distribute users across the environments. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* New releases must be available to only a subset of the users.

* You must gradually increase the number of users that can access environment2.

What should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Roslyn at Apr 08, 2024, 01:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Linn
6 months ago
I can see that, we need to gradually increase the number of users in environment2, and web app deployment slots can help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
6 months ago
That's true, but I think web app deployment slots are more suitable for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
6 months ago
But wouldn't Azure Traffic Manager also help in distributing users across environments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
6 months ago
I agree, with web app deployment slots we can control the release to different subsets of users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
6 months ago
I think we should use web app deployment slots for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
6 months ago
I think Azure Load Balancer could also work for distributing users across the environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
6 months ago
That's a good point, but VIP swapping could also be a good option for managing the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
7 months ago
But wouldn't Azure Traffic Manager be better for gradually increasing the number of users on environment2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
7 months ago
I agree with Tandra, using deployment slots will help us control the release to a subset of users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
7 months ago
I think we should use web app deployment slots for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree with you. VIP swapping feels a bit outdated for this kind of scenario. Azure Traffic Manager could work, but I'm leaning more towards the web app deployment slots option. That seems like a more modern and Azure-specific solution that could handle the gradual rollout requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
8 months ago
But what about Azure Traffic Manager? Couldn't that also help us distribute users across the environments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
8 months ago
Exactly. I think web app deployment slots are the way to go. It's the most straightforward solution that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
8 months ago
True, but I think Traffic Manager is more for routing traffic between different Azure regions, not within the same project. It might be overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
8 months ago
I'm not convinced that VIP swapping is the right solution here. Isn't that more of an on-premises kind of thing? I feel like we should be looking at more cloud-native solutions, like maybe Azure Traffic Manager or even the web app deployment slots option.
upvoted 0 times
Theola
6 months ago
User4
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
7 months ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
7 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
8 months ago
Haha, VIP swapping, that takes me back. Remember the good old days of manual IIS deployments? 'Have you tried turning it off and on again?' Anyway, I think you're right, C) VIP swapping could be a good fit here. It allows you to gradually shift traffic between the two environments.
upvoted 0 times
Jade
8 months ago
Let's go with C) VIP swapping for this project in Azure DevOps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
8 months ago
I remember those days too! VIP swapping definitely simplifies things compared to manual IIS deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
8 months ago
VIP swapping is a great option for controlled deployments and managing traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
8 months ago
Definitely, it will help with gradually increasing the number of users accessing environment2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
8 months ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to distribute users across the environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
8 months ago
Yes, VIP swapping sounds like the perfect fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
8 months ago
Alright, I'm convinced. Deployment slots it is. Now let's just hope the exam question doesn't have a trick up its sleeve!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about B) Azure Traffic Manager. Wouldn't that be more for load balancing across different regions or data centers? I feel like the requirement of gradually increasing the number of users in environment2 might be better suited to something like VIP swapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
8 months ago
I agree, this is a good question. It's testing our knowledge of Azure deployment options. I'm leaning towards either B) Azure Traffic Manager or C) VIP swapping as the potential solutions here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
8 months ago
This is an interesting question. It seems to be testing our understanding of different ways to distribute users across environments in Azure DevOps. I think the key requirements here are being able to gradually increase the number of users in the new environment and only allowing a subset of users to access the new release initially.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77