Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-700 Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All AZ-700 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it as a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Front Door Premium profile named AFD1 and an Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) policy named WAF1. AFD1 is associated with WAFT.

You need to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.

Solution: You configure a custom rule for WAF1.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Topic 4, Labs / Tasks


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jovita
8 months ago
You know, I was thinking the same thing as Lewis. Configuring the rate limit on the AFD1 profile itself feels like the more logical approach. But hey, maybe the question is trying to trick us! I'm still undecided on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
8 months ago
Haha, this exam is really testing our Azure knowledge, isn't it? I'm going to go with 'B) No' on this one. Seems like there might be a more direct way to configure the rate limit that doesn't involve the WAF policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
8 months ago
Hmm, I think this might work, but I'm a little hesitant. Wouldn't it be better to configure the rate limit directly on the AFD1 profile instead of using the WAF policy? That seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
Cortney
7 months ago
A: That makes sense, thanks for explaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
8 months ago
B: I see your point, but using the WAF policy allows for more granular control and customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
8 months ago
A: But wouldn't it be simpler to configure it directly on the AFD1 profile?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
8 months ago
B: Because the custom rule for WAF1 can help in configuring the rate limit for incoming requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 months ago
A: Why do you think it will work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
8 months ago
B: No
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
8 months ago
A: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
8 months ago
I'm not sure about this question. Configuring a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1 using a custom rule in WAF1 seems like a reasonable approach, but I'm not confident that it will meet the goal. We'd need to double-check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77