Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-700 Topic 12 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 12
[All AZ-700 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it as a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Front Door Premium profile named AFD1 and an Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) policy named WAF1. AFD1 is associated with WAF1.

You need to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.

Solution: You modify the policy settings of WAF1.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Karrie
5 months ago
No, I don't think modifying the policy settings of WAF1 will actually achieve the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
5 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe there could be another way to configure the rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
I agree, modifying the policy settings of WAF1 should meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
5 months ago
Yes, that should work to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
6 months ago
I think the solution is to modify the policy settings of WAF1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
6 months ago
Alright, I'll go with the consensus. Let's go with modifying the policy settings of WAF1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
6 months ago
I think we should stick to the given solution to ensure we meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
6 months ago
I see your point, but the question specifically mentions modifying the policy settings of WAF1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
6 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to directly modify the settings of AFD1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
7 months ago
I agree with Gaston. Modifying the policy settings should help configure the rate limit for incoming requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
7 months ago
I think the solution is to modify the WAF1 policy settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
8 months ago
I bet the real answer is not even one of the options given. This exam likes to throw curveballs like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
8 months ago
Ah, the old 'let's throw the WAF at it' approach. Classic Azure move. *chuckles* Seriously though, I'm with you guys. Modifying the WAF policy feels like a bit of a hack. There's gotta be a more straightforward way to handle this. I'm gonna need to see some solid evidence before I agree that this is the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
Janet
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
8 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
8 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valda
8 months ago
You know, I was thinking the same thing. Seems like there should be a way to configure the rate limit directly on the Front Door profile, without having to go through the WAF. Maybe we're missing something here. *scratches head* Ah well, guess we'll have to dig into the details on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the solution provided is correct or not. Maybe we need to look at the Azure documentation to see how to properly configure a rate limit for Azure Front Door.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
8 months ago
Haha, 'let's throw the WAF at it'. I like that one. But you're right, we need to be sure we're not just doing some convoluted workaround here. If this is the intended solution, I'd want to see some clear documentation or guidance on why this is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
8 months ago
Exactly. I mean, I'm all for creative problem-solving, but in a certification exam, we need to stick to the tested and true methods, you know? I'm gonna hold off on this one until I can get some more clarity on whether this is really the right way to handle a Front Door rate limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
8 months ago
I think the answer is 'No'. The question specifically states that you need to configure a rate limit for AFD1, and modifying the WAF1 policy settings doesn't sound like the right way to do that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
8 months ago
Maybe the question is trying to trick us. Modifying the WAF1 policy settings might not be the right solution, but the question says it 'might' meet the goal. We should be careful with these types of questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
8 months ago
I agree. The question states that you need to configure a rate limit for AFD1, but the solution says to modify the WAF1 policy settings. That doesn't seem to be the correct way to achieve the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
8 months ago
I'm not sure about this question. Modifying the WAF1 policy settings doesn't sound like the right approach to configure a rate limit for AFD1.
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
7 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77