Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-700 Topic 5 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-700 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it as a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Front Door Premium profile named AFD1 and an Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) policy named WAF1. AFD1 is associated with WAFT.

You need to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.

Solution: You configure a custom rule for WAF1.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Topic 4, Labs / Tasks


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jesus
8 months ago
You know, I was just thinking the same thing. The WAF policy is for web application firewall rules, not necessarily rate limiting for the whole Front Door service. We should be able to set up rate limiting within the Front Door configuration itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. The question is a bit vague, but I think the solution they're looking for is to configure the rate limiting directly on the Front Door profile, not through the WAF policy. That would be the more logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The question states we need to configure a rate limit for the Front Door, but the solution mentions setting up a custom rule in the WAF policy. That doesn't sound like the correct way to do it.
upvoted 0 times
Johana
7 months ago
Good idea. Let's think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
8 months ago
Let's reconsider our options then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
8 months ago
I see what you mean now. It should be a different approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
8 months ago
The solution should be configuring a rate limit for the Front Door, not the WAF policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
8 months ago
Why do you think it's incorrect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
8 months ago
No, that doesn't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
8 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Configuring a custom rule for the WAF policy to implement a rate limit for the Front Door profile doesn't seem like the right approach. Shouldn't we be looking at the Front Door configuration directly?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77