Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-100 Topic 1 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-100 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 1
[All DP-100 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You use Azure Machine Learning designer to load the following datasets into an experiment:

You need to create a dataset that has the same columns and header row as the input datasets and contains all rows from both input datasets.

Solution: Use the Join Data module.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Candra
5 months ago
Join Data, huh? I hope it doesn't take too long to figure out all the settings. Azure ML designer can be a real maze sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
4 months ago
I agree, the settings can be overwhelming at first, but it gets easier with practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
4 months ago
It can be tricky, but once you get the hang of it, it's pretty powerful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tresa
6 months ago
The Join Data module, huh? I guess that works, but it feels a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Where's the creativity, people?
upvoted 0 times
Andra
5 months ago
I agree, there might be other more creative ways to combine the datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
5 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
5 months ago
The Join Data module is the most efficient way to achieve the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacquelyne
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't it be easier to just use the Union Rows module? Seems like overkill to go through the join process.
upvoted 0 times
Maricela
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't it be easier to just use the Union Rows module? Seems like overkill to go through the join process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
5 months ago
Using Join Data module is the correct solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
5 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
6 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
6 months ago
Union Rows module may not preserve the columns and header row structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
6 months ago
Join Data module is more efficient for combining datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linette
6 months ago
Yep, the solution checks out. Joining the datasets will give you a single table with all the rows from both inputs. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
6 months ago
The Join Data module seems like the right tool for this task. Combining datasets with matching columns is exactly what it's designed for.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvia
5 months ago
Agreed, it's perfect for combining datasets with matching columns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
5 months ago
I think the Join Data module is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
The Join Data module is perfect for combining datasets with matching columns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
6 months ago
That's correct. The Join Data module is perfect for combining datasets with matching columns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
6 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Major
6 months ago
I disagree, I don't think the Join Data module will work for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
6 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77