Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-300 Topic 9 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-300 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 9
[All DP-300 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription.

Vou need to deploy two instances of SQL Server on Azure virtual machines in a highly available configuration that will use an Always On availability group. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Minimize how long it takes to fail over.

* Maintain existing connections to the primary replica during a failover.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Regenia
2 months ago
Failover? More like 'Fail-over-and-over-again' if you don't choose the right option. B is the way to go, people. Let's not make this a high stakes game of 'Guess the Azure Solution'.
upvoted 0 times
Deeanna
14 days ago
Agreed, B is the way to go to ensure a smooth failover process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
19 days ago
B is definitely the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 months ago
C) Connect each virtual machine to a different subnet on a single virtual network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 months ago
B) Connect each virtual machine to a single subnet on a virtual network. Deploy a standard Azure load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarah
2 months ago
Option A? Really? Connecting each VM to a single subnet? That's just asking for trouble. Clearly, the correct answer is B. The standard load balancer is the way to go, my dudes.
upvoted 0 times
Carmela
1 months ago
Definitely, Option B is the best solution for deploying SQL Server instances in a highly available configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 months ago
I agree, Option B is the correct choice. The standard load balancer will help maintain existing connections during failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 months ago
Option A? Really? Connecting each VM to a single subnet? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daryl
2 months ago
I'd say Option C is the best choice here. Connecting each VM to a different subnet on a single virtual network should provide the high availability and failover capabilities required.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
1 months ago
Let's go with Option C then. It seems like the most reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 months ago
I agree, having each VM on a different subnet is key for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
1 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. It will help with high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theodora
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards Option D. A basic load balancer should do the trick and it's a more cost-effective solution. As long as it meets the requirements, why pay more?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
3 months ago
But deploying a standard Azure load balancer will help maintain existing connections during failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
3 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
3 months ago
Option B is the way to go. The standard Azure load balancer will help minimize failover time and maintain existing connections during the process. Seems like the most efficient solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go. The standard Azure load balancer will help minimize failover time and maintain existing connections during the process. Seems like the most efficient solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
B) Connect each virtual machine to a single subnet on a virtual network. Deploy a standard Azure load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77