Microsoft Exam MB-210 Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-210 exam

Question #: 91
Topic #: 5

A sales manager creates a marketing list that includes all contacts from a specific city. The manager plans to use the list in a campaign. The manager forgot to filter out contacts who have a credit hold. You need to create a campaign with the updated contacts. What should you do?

ACreate a new dynamic marketing list by using different purpose and source fields. Then add both marketing lists to the campaign.

BRemove the contacts from the marketing list by using Advanced Find. Then add the marketing list to the campaign.

CCopy the original marketing list to static and remove the contacts by using Advanced Find. Add both marketing lists to the campaign.

DRemove the contacts from the marketing list by using a Lookup. Then add the marketing list to the campaign.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Malcolm at Apr 12, 2024, 08:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-210 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Corrina

5 months ago

I still think removing contacts using Advanced Find is the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

5 months ago

I think that might be a bit more complicated than just using Advanced Find, don't you think?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

5 months ago

Hmm, I see. But what about copying the original list to static and then removing the contacts?

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

5 months ago

I agree with User2, removing contacts using Advanced Find seems like a more straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrina

6 months ago

But wouldn't it be easier to just remove the contacts using Advanced Find?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

6 months ago

I think we should create a new dynamic marketing list with updated contacts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

6 months ago

I prefer using Lookup to remove the contacts. It's quicker and more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

6 months ago

I think copying the original list to static and then removing the contacts might be a safer option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

6 months ago

But wouldn't it be easier to just remove the contacts using Advanced Find?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

7 months ago

Yeah, I agree. That way we can easily filter out the contacts with a credit hold.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

7 months ago

I think we should create a new dynamic marketing list for the campaign.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about option B. Removing contacts from the list entirely feels a bit risky to me. I'd be worried about accidentally deleting someone important. Option A is starting to sound better and better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

8 months ago

Using a Lookup? That seems overly complicated. Why not just use the built-in Advanced Find functionality that the other options mention? This exam loves to throw in weird niche approaches to trip us up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coletta

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not convinced. Option C seems more robust to me, creating a static copy of the list and then removing the problem contacts. That way you have a backup of the original list.

upvoted 0 times

...

Serina

8 months ago

I'm leaning towards option B. It's straightforward and gets the job done quickly. Plus, we can always recreate the list later if we need to. *shrugs* What do you all think?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorethea

8 months ago

I agree, this question seems a bit too specific. But let's take a look at the options. I think B is the best answer - using Advanced Find to remove the contacts on credit hold seems the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

Tatum

7 months ago

Great, looks like we're all leaning towards A then. Let's go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tran

8 months ago

In that case, I'll go with A as well. It seems like a more efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

8 months ago

Hmm, A does seem like a good idea. It could potentially make things easier in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

8 months ago

But wouldn't creating a new dynamic marketing list be a better option? That's what A suggests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

8 months ago

I agree, D could be an alternative solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

8 months ago

I think D could also work, using a Lookup to remove the contacts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

8 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Apolonia

8 months ago

This question is tricky. I don't like how it's trying to catch us on the details of handling marketing lists with contacts on credit hold. That feels like a niche use case that isn't really core to the exam objectives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

8 months ago

Option C sounds interesting, but I'm not sure I trust making a static copy of the list. What if something changes down the line? I'd rather go with a dynamic solution like option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

8 months ago

Haha, I can just imagine the sales manager's face when they realized they forgot about the credit holds! *chuckles* Anyway, I agree with Reuben - option A seems like the safest bet. We don't want to accidentally delete anyone important.

upvoted 0 times

Oneida

7 months ago

Definitely. Adding both marketing lists to the campaign ensures we don't miss out on anyone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carry

7 months ago

I agree. Option A seems like the safest choice to avoid accidentally deleting important contacts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

7 months ago

Yes, I think creating a new dynamic marketing list with both original and updated contacts is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

8 months ago

I think option A is the way to go. Creating a new dynamic list with the right fields will make it easy to keep the contacts but filter out the ones with credit holds. Plus, having both lists in the campaign gives us more flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elinore

8 months ago

This is a tricky question! We need to be really careful about how we handle contacts with credit holds. I'm not sure if I agree with just removing them from the list - we should probably find a way to keep them but not include them in the campaign.

upvoted 0 times

...