Microsoft Exam MB-240 Topic 6 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-240 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 6

You are setting up assets for a customer.

The VP of Field Service wants to have greater visibility to all the serialized components of an asset in a hierarchical view.

Solution: You create an Asset Category and associate it with each component and use the Location Tree for viewing. Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Ula at Aug 07, 2024, 04:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-240 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Charolette

3 months ago

I think we should consider other options as well, not just relying on Asset Category and Location Tree for visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

3 months ago

I agree with Mitsue, having the hierarchical view through the Asset Category and Location Tree should be sufficient for the VP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

3 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? If I say A, do I get a free coffee or something? No? Alright, I'll go with B then. Hierarchy is key, my friends.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

3 months ago

B is the way to go. Can't fool the VP with some half-baked Location Tree nonsense. They want the real deal, and that means an Asset Category.

upvoted 0 times

Mollie

3 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

3 months ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

3 months ago

I disagree, I don't think just creating an Asset Category and using the Location Tree is enough to meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

3 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to say A, just to be different. Shake things up a bit, you know? Who needs hierarchies anyway? Living on the edge over here.

upvoted 0 times

Jeanice

3 months ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Sue

3 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Bethanie

3 months ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

3 months ago

Yes, I think creating an Asset Category and using the Location Tree will provide the VP with the visibility they need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

4 months ago

I still think the solution is sufficient. The Location Tree view should be enough for the VP to have visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phil

4 months ago

I agree with Felix. Custom reports can provide more detailed information for the VP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

4 months ago

B for sure. The question specifically says the VP wants a hierarchical view of the serialized components, and the Location Tree alone won't cut it. Gotta use that Asset Category.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

4 months ago

I think the solution is not enough. We should also consider creating custom reports for better visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

4 months ago

I'm going with A. The Location Tree should provide the hierarchical view the VP wants, right? Seems like a simple solution.

upvoted 0 times

Kathrine

3 months ago

I agree, it seems like a simple and effective solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

3 months ago

Yes, the Location Tree should provide the hierarchical view the VP wants.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

4 months ago

Yes, this solution meets the goal because it allows the VP to see all serialized components in a hierarchical view.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

4 months ago

Definitely B. Using the Location Tree alone won't give you a hierarchical view of the components. You need to create an Asset Category to associate the components.

upvoted 0 times

Carol

3 months ago

I agree, creating an Asset Category is necessary for a hierarchical view.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

3 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

4 months ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...