Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 4 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam

Question #: 100
Topic #: 4

A company has implemented Dynamics 365 Finance.

The company pays taxes quarterly to the states of Florida, Nebraska, and Washington. These states have been set up as tax authorities within Dynamics 365 Finance.

You need to configure the system to remit tax payments.

What should you do?

ASet up a customer record for the tax authority.

BAssociate the vendor record to the tax authority.

CAssociate the vendor record to The settlement period.

DSet up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Lavonna at Aug 04, 2024, 01:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Argelia

3 months ago

I agree with Leeann, setting up the jurisdiction is the best option for remitting tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

3 months ago

I think setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe we should associate the vendor record to the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

3 months ago

I think we should set up a customer record for the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

3 months ago

I agree with Anthony, setting up the jurisdiction seems like the best option for remitting tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

3 months ago

But wouldn't setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority be more accurate?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe we should associate the vendor record to the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marla

4 months ago

D all the way! Gotta love those tax authorities. Can't wait to get my hands on that jurisdiction setup. Maybe I'll throw in a few jokes about the IRS while I'm at it.

upvoted 0 times

Desire

3 months ago

C: Definitely, setting up the jurisdiction is key for tax remittance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

3 months ago

B: Yeah, that sounds like the right move. The IRS jokes might be a hit too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

3 months ago

A: Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. B might work too, since we're dealing with vendors here. But D does sound more specific to the task at hand.

upvoted 0 times

Eliseo

2 months ago

D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

2 months ago

I think D is the correct option. It seems more specific to the task of remitting tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

2 months ago

B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

3 months ago

A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

4 months ago

I think we should set up a customer record for the tax authority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colene

4 months ago

I think D is the way to go. Setting up the jurisdiction and associating it with the tax authority seems like the logical step to configure the system for tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

Willard

3 months ago

C) Associate the vendor record to The settlement period might be necessary for tracking and managing tax payments effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Telma

4 months ago

Associating the vendor record to the tax authority could also be helpful in streamlining the process of tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

4 months ago

I think A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority would also be necessary to ensure accurate remittance of tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannon

4 months ago

I agree, setting up the jurisdiction and associating it with the tax authority is important for tax payments.

upvoted 0 times

...