Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 7 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 7
[All MB-310 Questions]

A company has implemented Dynamics 365 Finance.

The company pays taxes quarterly to the states of Florida, Nebraska, and Washington. These states have been set up as tax authorities within Dynamics 365 Finance.

You need to configure the system to remit tax payments.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Scarlet at Apr 09, 2024, 11:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
King
5 months ago
I think setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority would provide a clearer structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
5 months ago
But wouldn't it be more appropriate to associate the vendor record to the tax authority?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
6 months ago
I agree, setting up a customer record would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
6 months ago
I think we should set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
6 months ago
I think setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
6 months ago
I disagree. I believe we should associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
7 months ago
I think we need to set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
8 months ago
Definitely D. Gotta love those jurisdictions and authorities. And let's be honest, who doesn't enjoy a good tax payment configuration discussion? It's the highlight of my day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, you don't want to accidentally send the Florida taxes to Nebraska, am I right? That would be a real headache to sort out later. Better get those jurisdictions locked down from the start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
8 months ago
Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. Gotta get those jurisdictions set up properly. Otherwise, how's the system going to know where to send the tax money? It's not rocket science, but you definitely need to get the fundamentals right.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
7 months ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
No, that won't help in remitting tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
8 months ago
C) Associate the vendor record to The settlement period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
8 months ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
8 months ago
Exactly, setting up the jurisdiction is crucial for accurate tax remittance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
8 months ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
8 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
8 months ago
I agree, those first two options don't seem relevant. I think the key here is setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority. That way, the system will know which jurisdiction the tax payments need to go to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, tell me about it! I feel like I need an advanced degree in taxation just to navigate these Dynamics 365 Finance modules. But hey, at least we get to flex our problem-solving muscles, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
8 months ago
Hmm, this question is a bit tricky. We need to think carefully about the requirements here. Setting up a customer record for the tax authority doesn't sound right, since they're not a customer. And associating the vendor record to the settlement period doesn't make sense either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
8 months ago
I'm with you guys on option D. Seems like the most logical way to set it up. Although, I have to say, sometimes these tax questions make me want to pull my hair out. It's like a whole different language!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
8 months ago
Ooh, tricky! I was thinking option B might be the way to go, but after thinking it through, I think D makes the most sense. Gotta love those tax configurations, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
8 months ago
I agree, it's a pretty basic configuration question. I'd say the correct answer is D - Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority. That's the way I would approach it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question about setting up tax authorities in Dynamics 365 Finance. I think the key is to understand the relationship between the vendor record, the tax authority, and the jurisdiction.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
7 months ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
7 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
7 months ago
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77