Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-330 Topic 20 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 20
[All MB-330 Questions]

A company uses Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. The company acquired a multinational food packaging business that has 30 facilities operating in multiple countries/regions.

Packaging machines must be systematically registered and tracked across all facilities

You need to create the packing machine assets to meet the tracking requirements.

What should you create?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bette
5 months ago
I believe creating a functional location type would also help in categorizing the packaging machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
5 months ago
But should we also consider creating a functional location lifecycle model for better management?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
6 months ago
I agree, creating a functional location is important for tracking the packaging machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
6 months ago
I think we should create a functional location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
6 months ago
I believe creating a functional location type would also help in categorizing the packaging machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
7 months ago
But should we also consider creating a functional location lifecycle model for better management?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
7 months ago
I agree, creating a functional location is important for tracking the packaging machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
7 months ago
I think we should create a functional location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
8 months ago
Hmm, that's a fair point. A) functional location does seem like the foundational piece here. Maybe we start with that, and then layer on the lifecycle model and location types as needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
8 months ago
Yeah, I can see the logic in both C and D. But I'm worried that just creating a functional location type might not be enough to fully meet the tracking requirement. The lifecycle state option sounds like it would give us more control and visibility over the machines as they move between facilities. I'm gonna go with D on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
8 months ago
Haha, I love these tricky Dynamics 365 questions. They always try to trip you up with similar-sounding options. But I think the key here is the requirement to 'systematically register and track' the machines. That tells me we need to create some kind of lifecycle model, so I'm going with D) functional location lifecycle state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
8 months ago
Hold on, what about A) functional location? Isn't that the basic building block for all this? I mean, you need to actually create the asset itself before you can start tracking its life cycle or categorizing it, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
8 months ago
I agree, this is definitely about functional locations. From the information given, it sounds like we need to create a way to systematically register and track the packaging machines. So I'm leaning towards C) functional location type as the best answer. That would let us define the different types of packaging machines and associate them with the facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
8 months ago
Ooh, good point! I didn't even think of that. The life cycle model could be super helpful, especially for a multinational company with so many facilities. I'm leaning towards B) now.
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
7 months ago
I agree, having a lifecycle model in place would definitely help with tracking across multiple facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
7 months ago
I think B) functional location lifecycle model makes the most sense for tracking packaging machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brandon
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our knowledge of functional locations in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. I think the answer is either C) functional location type or D) functional location lifecycle state. We need to create something that allows us to track the packaging machines across all facilities, and those two options seem most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
8 months ago
I don't know, you guys. What about B) functional location lifecycle model? Wouldn't that be better to track the life cycle of the machines, like when they were installed, serviced, and potentially replaced? That seems like crucial information to have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
8 months ago
I was thinking the same thing, C) functional location type. That way you can have different types of machines and track them accordingly. Plus, it sounds like it's the most comprehensive option to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between these options, but I think I might go with C) functional location type. That sounds like it would be the best way to categorize the different types of packaging machines across all the facilities.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
7 months ago
Agreed. Ultimately, the choice would depend on the specific tracking requirements of the company's operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
8 months ago
Yes, it's important to consider how each option can contribute to effectively managing the assets across multiple facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
8 months ago
I see your point. It seems like each option serves a different purpose in tracking the packaging machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
8 months ago
True, but B) functional location lifecycle model could provide a structured approach to managing the machines' lifecycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
8 months ago
That's a good point. However, I think A) functional location is needed to specify the exact location of each machine within the facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
8 months ago
But wouldn't D) functional location lifecycle state be more useful for tracking the machines' status?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
8 months ago
I agree, C) functional location type would help categorize the packaging machines effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77