Microsoft Exam MB-335 Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-335 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 1

A company manufactures high performance bicycles.

The bicycles come in several different preconfigured models. Customers can also purchase custom configurations. Several add-ons are dependent on other accessories in order to be installed.

You need to set up the system to handle the different product configurations.

What should you do?

ACreate an expression constraint.

BCreate a phantom BOM.

CCreate a co-product.

DCreate a batch version.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Alecia at Apr 13, 2024, 01:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-335 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Anisha

6 months ago

Creating a batch version could also be a good option to handle the different configurations efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

6 months ago

I think creating a co-product could also work, it might simplify the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Craig

6 months ago

I agree with Krystina, a phantom BOM would make it easier to handle different configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

7 months ago

But wouldn't it be better to create a phantom BOM instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

7 months ago

I think we should create an expression constraint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

7 months ago

I think we should create a batch version to handle different product configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

7 months ago

I believe creating a co-product would be the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucia

7 months ago

I disagree. We should create a phantom BOM.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tambra

7 months ago

I think we should create an expression constraint.

upvoted 0 times

...

You know, I was actually leaning towards option D - creating a batch version. That way, we can have different versions of the product to represent the various configurations. It might be a bit more work upfront, but it could make the overall system more flexible and easier to manage in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

8 months ago

Alright, let's break this down. Option A, expression constraints, seems to be the most straightforward way to handle the dependencies between accessories. That's my pick.

upvoted 0 times

Latricia

8 months ago

So, expression constraints it is then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

8 months ago

Definitely, we don't want any issues with add-ons.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannon

8 months ago

It's important to handle those dependencies properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

8 months ago

I agree, expression constraints should work well for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamie

8 months ago

Option A sounds like the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not convinced. A phantom BOM seems like it might add unnecessary complexity. I'm wondering if option C - creating a co-product - could be a more straightforward solution. That way, we can handle the different configurations without having to worry about all the intricate rules and dependencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nenita

8 months ago

I'm not so sure about that. Creating an expression constraint sounds a bit complicated, and I'm not sure it's the best fit for handling the different product configurations. What about option B - a phantom BOM? That might be a simpler way to manage the dependencies between the accessories and parts.

upvoted 0 times

Carolann

7 months ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Kizzy

8 months ago

I don't know, I'm a bit skeptical about that. Option D, creating a batch version, seems like it could be overkill for this scenario. Unless there are some specific requirements around versioning, I don't think that's the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dacia

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not convinced. Option C, creating a co-product, could be the way to go. That might be useful if the different bicycle models are considered related products rather than just configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

8 months ago

This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I might have an idea. I'm leaning towards option A - creating an expression constraint. That would allow us to define the rules and dependencies for the different configurations and add-ons, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

8 months ago

I'm not so sure about that. Option B, creating a phantom BOM, might be a better approach. That would allow you to group the required accessories together as a single item, making it easier to manage the configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anastacia

8 months ago

Yeah, I agree. I'm leaning towards option A, creating an expression constraint. That seems like the best way to handle the different product configurations and dependencies between accessories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmen

8 months ago

This is an interesting question. I think it's testing our knowledge of product configuration management in a manufacturing context. Let's see what the different options mean and which one makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Microsoft Exam MB-335 Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Anisha

Delmy

Craig

Krystina

Deeanna

Art

Cherry

Lucia

Tambra

Corazon

Tegan

Latricia

Golda

Shannon

Joanna

Tamie

Flo

Nenita

Carolann

Kizzy

Dacia

Latanya

Billye

Anastacia

Carmen