Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-500 Topic 11 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 11
[All MB-500 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You must extend the class SaleslineType and add a new method that returns the day of week for the system's current date as an integer value

You need to create a class that extends SalesLineType and adds the new method.

Solution: You create the following code:

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Clemencia
5 months ago
That's a good idea, let's run some tests to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
5 months ago
I still have doubts, can we test the code to confirm if it really works as intended?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
5 months ago
The new method in the extended class returns the day of the week as an integer, which is what the goal requires.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
5 months ago
I'm not sure, can someone explain why they think it meets the goal?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
5 months ago
I agree with Xenia, the code looks correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
6 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
6 months ago
I believe it should work fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
7 months ago
We can run some test cases to ensure it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
7 months ago
But I'm not sure, can we test it first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
7 months ago
I agree, the code looks correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
7 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
8 months ago
You know, if I had a nickel for every time an exam question was a bit 'off', I'd be a rich person. But I think the solution works, so I'm going to go with 'Yes'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
8 months ago
I don't know, something about this feels a bit too easy. Are we sure there isn't some catch or hidden requirement we're missing?
upvoted 0 times
Carman
6 months ago
It's always good to be cautious and thorough
upvoted 0 times
...
My
6 months ago
I agree, let's take another look at the instructions
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
6 months ago
Maybe we should double-check the requirements to be sure
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilberto
8 months ago
I agree, the solution seems to meet the requirements. The code is clear and concise, and it does what the question asks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, Emily. You're probably just trying to find a way to make this question more challenging than it needs to be. Sometimes we just need to trust the solution and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
8 months ago
I'm not loving this question. It's a bit vague, and the solution provided doesn't seem to match the requirement exactly. I'm leaning towards 'No' on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems straightforward enough. We need to create a new class that extends the SalesLineType class and adds a new method that returns the day of the week as an integer value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, that 'no going back' rule is a real pain. I bet the exam designers wanted to keep us on our toes. But I think the solution is sound, so I'm going with 'Yes'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
8 months ago
Wait, the question says we can't go back to review the previous questions. That's a bummer. I'd feel better if we could at least take another look before answering.
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
7 months ago
I guess we just have to trust our instincts when answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
8 months ago
No, we just have to make our best guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
8 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
8 months ago
Yes, I wish we could double-check our answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
8 months ago
I think we don't have the option to review the previous questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
8 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
8 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luther
8 months ago
Hmm, I think the solution looks correct. By extending the SalesLineType class and adding the new method, it should meet the goal. But I'd like to double-check the implementation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
8 months ago
I'm not sure about this question. The requirement seems straightforward, but I'm not confident in the solution provided. I'll need to review the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77