Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-820 Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-820 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 5
[All MB-820 Questions]

You need to define the data types for the fields of the N on-conformity table.

Which two data types should you use? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

In Business Central, fields in tables are assigned specific data types that determine the kind of data they can store. For the Non-conformity table mentioned in the case study, the following data types should be used:

Date for the Non-Conformity Date field: This is because the Non-conformity Date field is required to store only the date when the non-conformity was recorded. The Date data type is appropriate for storing dates without times.

Code for the Non-Conformity Number field: The Non-conformity Number field is described to use alphanumeric values with a format that includes 'NC' and the year, like 'NC24-001'. In Business Central, the Code data type is used for fields that store alphanumeric keys. It is a text field with a limited length, which makes it suitable for number series that contain letters and numbers.

Other options are not suitable:

A) Integer for the Non-conformity Number field: This would not be appropriate because the Non-conformity Number includes alphanumeric characters and not just integers.

B) DateTime for the Non-Conformity Date field: This is not correct because there is no requirement to store the time alongside the date.

C) Char for the Non-Conformity Number field: Char data type is not typically used in Business Central for number series or identifiers. The Code data type is preferred for this purpose.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Zona
2 months ago
Ah yes, the age-old debate: Integer vs. Char for a number field. I say we settle this with a game of rock-paper-scissors. Loser has to use Char.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
2 months ago
Dude, did you even read the question? It clearly says 'which two data types should you use?' Not 'which one data type should you use?'. A and D are the way to go, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if you need to store some additional information in the Non-Conformity Number field? I'd go with C or E just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
2 months ago
I agree with Louvenia. A and D make the most sense. Plus, who wants to use Char or Code for a number field? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
21 days ago
Let's go with A and D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
24 days ago
Definitely, Integer and Date are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
25 days ago
I agree, using Char or Code for a number field seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
1 months ago
I think A and D are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
2 months ago
I think we should use Date Time for the Non-Conformity Date field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
I think A and D are the correct choices. The Non-Conformity Number should be an integer, and the Non-Conformity Date should be a Date type.
upvoted 0 times
Sharee
2 months ago
I believe A and E are the correct choices. Non-Conformity Number should be an integer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
I think B and D are the correct choices. Non-Conformity Date should be Date Time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
I agree with you, A and D are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bambi
3 months ago
I agree with Shala, Integer makes sense for the Non-Conformity Number field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
3 months ago
I think we should use Integer for the Non-Conformity Number field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77