Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-200 Topic 4 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 4
[All PL-200 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to is. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company uses a Dataverse environment. The environment is accessed from canvas and model-driven apps.

The Dataverse environment contains a table that has the following columns:

* Name

* Company

* Contacted On

The company requires that the table not contain any duplicate rows when users create data in the environment. You need to implement a solution that meets the requirement.

Solution: Create an alternate key for the columns.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tasia
7 months ago
I'm not sure about this solution. It seems too simple to be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
7 months ago
No, I don't think that will work. There might be other ways to prevent duplicate rows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
7 months ago
I think the solution is effective because it specifically targets the columns that need to be unique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
7 months ago
I agree. The alternate key will ensure uniqueness in the table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
7 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Creating an alternate key should prevent duplicate rows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
8 months ago
You make a good point, Lynsey. Either solution would work, but the unique index might be a more straightforward approach. I guess it really depends on the specific requirements and the overall design of the Dataverse environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
8 months ago
I'm a bit skeptical about this solution. Wouldn't it be simpler to just add a unique index on the columns instead of creating an alternate key? That might be a more efficient way to handle this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Jose
8 months ago
It definitely seems like a better approach to ensure no duplicate rows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 months ago
Adding a unique index does sound like a more efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
8 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
8 months ago
I agree, creating an alternate key seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
8 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raul
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The question is pretty clear, and this solution addresses the requirement of not having any duplicate rows. I don't see any issues with this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question. Creating an alternate key for the columns to enforce uniqueness is a reasonable solution, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77