Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 1 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 1
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant a pp.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Use the maker portal to export the custom connector. Then use the maker portal to import the connector into the production environment.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Theron
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think we should consider other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
2 months ago
This is a piece of cake! Bet the developers could do this with their eyes closed. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
2 months ago
I like how this solution keeps everything within the Microsoft ecosystem. Makes the deployment process nice and streamlined.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
1 months ago
Definitely, it simplifies things for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
2 months ago
I agree, it's nice to have everything in one ecosystem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 months ago
Yes, it does. It makes the deployment process streamlined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I think the solution is great, it keeps everything within Microsoft.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonja
3 months ago
Looks good to me! Exporting and importing through the maker portal is a straightforward way to move the custom connector to production.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
Definitely, it's a simple and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
Agreed, using the maker portal for exporting and importing seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
2 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coral
3 months ago
I agree with Anjelica, exporting and importing through the maker portal should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
3 months ago
Using the maker portal to export and import the custom connector seems like the logical solution. It ensures the connector is visible and accessible only to the tenant users.
upvoted 0 times
Serita
2 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
3 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florencia
3 months ago
The maker portal option is a good way to manage the deployment, but I wonder if there are any additional security measures we need to consider for the production environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
3 months ago
I think the solution is Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77