Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 4 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 4
[All PL-400 Questions]

A company designs a Microsoft Dataverse Custom API to encapsulate business logic in it

The Custom API business logic must be encapsulated in a way that does not allow the business logic behavior to be modified or canceled.

You need to set the parameter value of the custom API so it cannot be customized.

Which parameter value should you set?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquline
2 months ago
I'm just going to go with the option that's the most 'custom' - C. Custom Processing Step to None. Gotta keep that business logic on lock, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Callie
8 days ago
User 4: I'm just going to go with the option that's the most 'custom' - C) Custom Processing Step to None. Gotta keep that business logic on lock, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
22 days ago
User 3: I agree with Christiane, D) Enabled for Workflow to No sounds like the right choice
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
23 days ago
User 2: I'm not sure about that, I think it might be D) Enabled for Workflow to No
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
25 days ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timmy
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? Do I get bonus points for saying all of the above?
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
20 days ago
C) Custom Processing Step to None
upvoted 0 times
...
James
21 days ago
B) Binding Type to Entity
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
1 months ago
A) Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
2 months ago
This is a tough one, but I'm going with D. Enabled for Workflow to No. Seems like the best way to lock down that business logic.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
1 months ago
I agree with you, D) Enabled for Workflow to No seems like the best option to prevent customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards C) Custom Processing Step to None as the parameter value to set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 months ago
I think A) Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
2 months ago
But setting the parameter value to Custom Processing Step to None would allow customization, which goes against the requirement of not allowing the business logic behavior to be modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the parameter value should be set to Custom Processing Step to None.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. But I'm pretty confident B. Binding Type to Entity is the right choice. Sounds like it would do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Maddie
1 months ago
Yes, it's important to set parameters that prevent customization of the business logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
2 months ago
That makes sense, it would lock in the business logic behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
2 months ago
I agree, setting the Binding Type to Entity would help ensure the business logic cannot be modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
I think B) Binding Type to Entity is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meaghan
2 months ago
I think C. Custom Processing Step to None is the way to go. It's the most straightforward option to prevent customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
The answer is definitely A. Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep. This ensures the business logic can't be modified or canceled.
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
2 months ago
C) Custom Processing Step to None
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
2 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Setting the Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep ensures the business logic cannot be modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
2 months ago
A) Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
I think that's the best option to prevent any unwanted changes to the business logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
That makes sense, it ensures the business logic is protected from any modifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
I agree, setting the Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
3 months ago
I think the parameter value should be set to Execute Privilege Name to prv. SdkMessageProcessingStep.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77