Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 8 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 8
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company requires custom validation when users save form records that use a synchronous plug-in.

If validation fails, a message that explains how to resolve the issue must be displayed on the form to the user.

You need to implement the custom validation.

Solution: Include the message in the output parameters of the plug-in.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tiffiny
1 months ago
I agree with the solution. Putting the validation message in the output parameters is a clean and efficient way to handle this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Leila
14 days ago
User 3: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
18 days ago
User 2: B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
26 days ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
1 months ago
Well, at least it's not as bad as that time I tried to integrate a unicorn into our CRM system. Talk about a headache!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. Wouldn't it be better to handle the validation in the client-side code instead of the plug-in? That way, we can give the user immediate feedback without needing to make a round-trip to the server.
upvoted 0 times
Irene
17 days ago
Tayna: That makes sense, thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
21 days ago
User 3: I agree with Domitila, handling validation on the client-side would be more user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
26 days ago
User 2: B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
28 days ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theron
2 months ago
Yup, that's the way to go! Displaying the message directly on the form is much more user-friendly than having them dig through logs or something.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
19 days ago
I disagree, having the message in the output parameters is not user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
21 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
1 months ago
Exactly, it's important to provide clear feedback to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ricarda
2 months ago
B) No, because the message should be displayed on the form, not just in the output parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77