Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-600 Topic 9 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-600 exam

Question #: 53
Topic #: 9

[All PL-600 Questions]

A company is creating a Microsoft Power Platform app to enable employees to log daily time entries. Employee user accounts are in multiple Azure AD tenants and are not located in the tenant that is running the app.

Employees must be added as Azure AD guest accounts within the tenant that will be running the app. Employees must access the model-driven app by being a member of a security team. The security team has been assigned the Employee Security role. Employees must create personal views of records to view within the system.

You need to implement a security solution.

Which privilege should you use?

ADirect basic level

BAzure AD security group

CTeam

DShared app access

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Cathrine at Feb 08, 2024, 10:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-600 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Barabara

6 months ago

I prefer Shared app access because it ensures all employees have the necessary permissions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

6 months ago

I think Azure AD security group makes sense because it allows us to manage access more effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

6 months ago

I disagree, I believe Team would be a better option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zack

6 months ago

I think we should use Azure AD security group for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenita

7 months ago

I personally think Team is the way to go, it provides a clear structure for managing permissions within the app.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

7 months ago

But I feel like using a Team would also work well for this scenario, as it can help organize employees better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harley

7 months ago

I agree with Hyun, Azure AD security group seems like the best option for managing access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

7 months ago

I think we should use Azure AD security group for this security solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnee

8 months ago

Haha, this is like a game of 'choose your own adventure'. I can see valid arguments for both options C and B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgie

8 months ago

At the end of the day, we just need to make sure we don't end up with the 'direct basic level' approach. That would be a disaster!

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

8 months ago

True, it's a tough call. I guess we'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each approach and make our best judgment.

upvoted 0 times

Shayne

7 months ago

B) Azure AD security group

upvoted 0 times

...

Andree

8 months ago

Yeah, I agree. Using a team would help manage access and permissions more effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

8 months ago

C) Team

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

8 months ago

I see where you're coming from. Using an Azure AD security group could also work well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

8 months ago

B) Azure AD security group

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaiah

8 months ago

That's a good point. Using a team might be the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

8 months ago

C) Team

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77