Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam SC-100 Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 9
[All SC-100 Questions]

Your company has an Azure subscription that has enhanced security enabled for Microsoft Defender for Cloud.

The company signs a contract with the United States government. You need to review the current subscription for NIST 800-53 compliance. What should you do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Melissa
1 months ago
I'll go with option C. Auditing the current security baseline is the logical first step before adding any new compliance standards. Can't build on a shaky foundation, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
1 months ago
Adding a regulatory compliance standard in Defender for Cloud is a good idea, but I think it makes more sense to start by reviewing the existing baseline first.
upvoted 0 times
Salome
5 days ago
Once we have a clear understanding of the current state, we can then add a regulatory compliance standard if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
13 days ago
I agree, reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report should be the first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
2 months ago
Reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report is a solid choice. That should give me a clear picture of how the current setup measures up to the NIST standard.
upvoted 0 times
Verona
17 days ago
That sounds like a good plan. Checking the baseline will definitely help ensure NIST compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
19 days ago
C) From Defender for Cloud, review the Azure security baseline for audit report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 months ago
A) From Defender for Cloud, review the secure score recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renay
2 months ago
Configuring the Microsoft Defender for Cloud data connector in Sentinel could be useful, but it doesn't seem directly relevant to reviewing NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
The secure score recommendations seem like a good place to start. That's probably the quickest way to get an overview of the current security posture.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
9 days ago
D) From Defender for Cloud, add a regulatory compliance standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
17 days ago
C) From Defender for Cloud, review the Azure security baseline for audit report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 months ago
B) From Microsoft Sentinel, configure the Microsoft Defender for Cloud data connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
2 months ago
A) From Defender for Cloud, review the secure score recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
2 months ago
I think we should also review the Azure security baseline for audit report to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
2 months ago
I agree with Lashawna. It's important to prioritize security compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
2 months ago
I think we should review the secure score recommendations first.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77