Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam SC-200 Topic 4 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-200 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 4
[All SC-200 Questions]

You have a Microsoft Sentinel workspace named SW1.

In SW1, you investigate an incident that is associated with the following entities:

* Host

* IP address

* User account

* Malware name

Which entity can be labeled as an indicator of compromise (loC) directly from the incident s page?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chaya
4 months ago
Wait, I thought the incident was associated with a toaster. Isn't that an indicator of compromise these days? No? Okay, fine, I'll go with the malware name then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I'm just gonna go with the most obvious choice here - the malware name. It's like the criminal's calling card, right? Can't miss that one!
upvoted 0 times
Lovetta
4 months ago
Host could also be a potential indicator of compromise, depending on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
4 months ago
B) host
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
4 months ago
Yeah, that's a good choice. Malware name is a common indicator of compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
4 months ago
A) malware name
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tesha
5 months ago
This is a tough one, but I'm gonna have to go with option D. IP addresses don't lie, you know? They're like the digital fingerprints of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
Brinda
3 months ago
I agree with User2, I'll also choose option D. IP address is crucial in identifying the source of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
4 months ago
I agree with User2, I'll also choose option D. IP address is crucial in identifying the source of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. IP address can definitely provide valuable information in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. IP address can definitely provide valuable information in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
4 months ago
I think I'll go with option A. Malware name seems like a clear indicator of compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
4 months ago
I think I'll go with option A. Malware name seems like a clear indicator of compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valda
5 months ago
Oh, come on! The user account is the real IoC. Gotta catch that sneaky insider, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Jina
4 months ago
Troy: I agree, insiders can be the biggest threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
Nan: Definitely, the user account is the key indicator here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
4 months ago
D) IP address
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
4 months ago
C) user account
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
4 months ago
B) host
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
A) malware name
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emily
5 months ago
I think the IP address is the most likely indicator of compromise in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
5 months ago
But the host could also be a potential indicator, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to go with the host. It's the first thing you notice when something's not right, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
I think the IP address could be an IoC as well. You know, the hacker's calling card and all that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
5 months ago
The malware name is definitely the indicator of compromise. It's like the smoking gun of the incident!
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
4 months ago
B) host
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
4 months ago
Yes, the malware name is a clear indicator of compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
5 months ago
B) host
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
5 months ago
Yes, the malware name is a clear indicator of compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
5 months ago
A) malware name
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
5 months ago
A) malware name
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmela
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the user account is the indicator of compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
6 months ago
I think the indicator of compromise could be the malware name.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77