Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam SC-400 Topic 3 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-400 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 3
[All SC-400 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1.

You need to ensure that all email messages that contain attachments are encrypted automatically by using Microsoft Purview Message Encryption.

What should you create?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Samira
8 months ago
Hey, I'm just happy they're not asking us to write code or anything. At least it's multiple choice, right? Although, I gotta say, I'm still trying to figure out the difference between all these options. Anyone wanna break it down for me?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
8 months ago
Ooh, the information barrier segment could be an interesting choice. I mean, if you really want to keep those attachments under lock and key, that might be the way to go. But I don't know, it feels a little overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards the mail flow rule option. That seems like the most direct way to handle this requirement. Plus, it's probably easier to manage and tweak than a DLP policy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
8 months ago
Let's get that set up for User1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
8 months ago
Sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
8 months ago
Let's go with the mail flow rule then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
8 months ago
Yeah, managing a mail flow rule would be easier than a DLP policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
8 months ago
Agreed, it seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
8 months ago
I think we should create a mail flow rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
8 months ago
Whoa, this question is tricky! Encrypting all attachments automatically sounds like a pretty serious security measure. I'm not sure if I'd go with the sensitivity label or the DLP policy. Anyone have any thoughts?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77