Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam SC-400 Topic 4 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-400 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 4
[All SC-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Microsoft 365 tenant and 500 computers that run Windows 10. The computers are onboarded to Microsoft Purview.

You discover that a third-party application named Tailspin_scanner.exe accessed protected sensitive information on multiple computers. Tailspin_scanner.exe is installed locally on the computers.

You need to block Tailspin_scanner.exe from accessing sensitive documents without preventing the application from accessing other documents.

Solution: From Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, you create an app discovery policy.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jovita
5 months ago
I think the solution provided is the most efficient way to achieve the goal of blocking Tailspin_scanner.exe from accessing sensitive documents while still allowing access to other documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
5 months ago
I'm not sure. Maybe there could be other ways to block Tailspin_scanner.exe without creating an app discovery policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
5 months ago
I agree with Carla. It seems like the right solution to prevent the application from accessing protected sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
5 months ago
Yes, I think creating an app discovery policy in Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps should help block Tailspin_scanner.exe from accessing sensitive documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
5 months ago
Ah, the classic 'create a policy' solution. It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut, but hey, at least it's a solution, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
Wait, we're using Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps to block a local application? Seems like we're bringing a cannon to a knife fight.
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
4 months ago
No
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
4 months ago
Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thurman
6 months ago
App discovery policy? That's like trying to catch a mouse with a net made of butter. We need something stronger to block that sneaky Tailspin_scanner.exe.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
5 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
5 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77