Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-004 Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-004 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-004 Questions]

A storage administrator wants to expand an existing NetApp ONTAP AFF cluster with cost-effective nearline storage for archiving purposes.

What should the administrator do to accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

= Adding a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster is a way to expand the storage capacity with cost-effective nearline storage for archiving purposes. A FAS system can use HDDs as the performance tier and tier cold data to cloud object storage using FabricPool, which is a NetApp data tiering technology that reduces the amount of physical capacity taken up by data. This way, the administrator can leverage the storage efficiencies of ONTAP and the low-cost storage of the cloud to archive data that is not frequently accessed. The AFF and FAS systems can be managed by the same ONTAP cluster and provide seamless data access and protection.Reference=Storage Efficiencies - NetApp,Data Archiving: Cost-Effective Cloud Storage - NetApp,AFF Systems and Cloud Volumes ONTAP | NetApp.


by Bulah at Sep 15, 2024, 01:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-004 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Eleonore
2 months ago
I see both points, but adding SSDs to the existing AFF cluster could also be a viable option for performance improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe expanding the cluster with a new AFF system would be more cost-effective for archiving purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I should just flip a coin. Or better yet, ask the storage admin if they want to go bowling instead of worrying about this storage stuff. Less headache that way!
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
1 months ago
User 3: Why not just upgrade the AFF controllers to a higher system? It could be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 months ago
Yeah, that could work. But expanding the cluster with a new AFF system might also be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
1 months ago
I think adding a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster could be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maia
2 months ago
I think the administrator should add a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I'm going with B. Who wants to upgrade their controllers or buy a whole new system when you can just add a nice, affordable FAS box to the mix? Boom, problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
Jacquelyne
1 months ago
Expanding the cluster with a new AFF system could also work, but adding a FAS system is simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
1 months ago
Adding SSDs could be a good option too, but a new FAS system seems more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 months ago
I think upgrading the controllers might be a bit too expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 months ago
I agree, adding a new FAS system is a cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
3 months ago
C is the way to go. Expanding the cluster with a new AFF system would give you the performance and capacity you need for your archiving needs.
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
2 months ago
Expanding with a new AFF system is the way to go for archiving purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 months ago
I agree, adding a new AFF system to expand the cluster is the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
2 months ago
C is definitely the best option. It will provide the performance and capacity needed for archiving.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
3 months ago
D sounds good to me. Adding more SSDs to the existing AFF cluster would give you the extra storage space you need without having to buy a whole new system.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
2 months ago
Adding SSDs seems like the most efficient option for expanding the storage capacity of the NetApp ONTAP AFF cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
2 months ago
I agree. It's a practical solution that can save money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
That's a good point. It would be a cost-effective way to expand the storage capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
D sounds good to me. Adding more SSDs to the existing AFF cluster would give you the extra storage space you need without having to buy a whole new system.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuriko
3 months ago
I think the answer is B. Adding a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster would be the most cost-effective way to expand the storage for archiving purposes.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
2 months ago
Upgrading the AFF controllers might be too expensive compared to adding a new FAS system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
I agree, adding a new FAS system would be the best option for cost-effective expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77