Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-184 Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-184 Questions]

A storage administrator is trying to upgrade a pair of FAS2520s with internal SATA storage to a new 2-node FAS8300 cluster. The storage administrator wants to preserve the existing data.

In this scenario, which two capabilities are available to the storage administrator? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Queen
4 months ago
I'm just imagining the storage admin trying to stuff the entire FAS2520 into the new FAS8300. 'It'll fit, I promise!'
upvoted 0 times
Lacey
3 months ago
A) the ability to move the volumes from the old nodes to the new nodes
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
3 months ago
Haha, that would be quite a sight to see!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
3 months ago
B) the ability to pull out the tray of internal disks of the FAS2520s and reseat the tray in the internal storage of the FAS8300s
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
3 months ago
A) the ability to move the volumes from the old nodes to the new nodes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
4 months ago
This question is hilarious. It's like the storage admin is playing Tetris with their data center. 'Where does this disk tray fit best, hmm?'
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
4 months ago
I'm sorry, but who in their right mind would just 'reseat the tray' from the old system into the new one? That's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
4 months ago
I think option D could work too, converting the FAS2520s to disk shelves and attaching them to the new nodes could be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
4 months ago
Ooh, option C for the win! Gotta love that 4-node MetroCluster action. Spread that data across the land, my friend!
upvoted 0 times
Julie
3 months ago
A: Absolutely, especially when upgrading to a new cluster. It's important to preserve the existing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Romana
4 months ago
B: Yeah, it's always good to have that kind of redundancy and data protection in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
4 months ago
A: Option C does sound pretty cool! Having a 4-node MetroCluster would definitely spread the data out nicely.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
4 months ago
Hold up, isn't option D kinda genius? Converting the old nodes to disk shelves and attaching them to the new ones? That's some next-level storage admin skills right there.
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
3 months ago
Noe: That's true, that could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
But what about the ability to move the volumes from the old nodes to the new nodes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
4 months ago
Yeah, that could definitely save time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
4 months ago
Option D does sound like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
5 months ago
I'm not sure about option B, pulling out the tray of internal disks and reseating them might not be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Just move the volumes from the old to the new nodes, easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Kizzy
4 months ago
Option A is definitely the way to go. It's the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
4 months ago
B) the ability to pull out the tray of internal disks of the FAS2520s and reseat the tray in the internal storage of the FAS8300s
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
4 months ago
A) the ability to move the volumes from the old nodes to the new nodes
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
4 months ago
Definitely, it's important to preserve the existing data during the upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
I agree, moving the volumes seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edda
5 months ago
I agree with Alfreda, option A seems like a feasible solution to preserve the existing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
5 months ago
I think option A is possible because the volumes can be moved to the new nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77