NetApp Exam NS0-184 Topic 5 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 5

Click the Exhibit button.

Immediately after installing a 4-node FAS8200 cluster, you discover that node, ''cluster1-02'', must be removed from the cluster. You want to use the cluster remove-node command to remove the node.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)

AVerify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner, then remove the node.

BMake the node ineligible by using the cluster modify -eligibility false command, then remove the node.

CMove Epsilon to cluster1-02, then remove the node.

DRemove the node, then the cluster will elect a new master to remain in quorum.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

by Dallas at Sep 15, 2024, 03:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Melita

2 months ago

Wait, is 'Epsilon' the name of a node or some kind of magical cluster unicorn? I need to brush up on my networking lingo.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

2 months ago

Option A sounds like the way to go. Verifying HA first is always a good idea when making cluster changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

2 months ago

I'm a bit stumped on this one. Guess I'll have to read up more on cluster management.

upvoted 0 times

Lai

6 days ago

C) Move Epsilon to cluster1-02, then remove the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

15 days ago

I'm not sure which option to choose either. Let's look up some documentation together.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilma

22 days ago

B) Make the node ineligible by using the cluster modify -eligibility false command, then remove the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

1 months ago

Moving Epsilon to cluster1-02 doesn't seem necessary for node removal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

1 months ago

A) Verify that high availability is configured for failover to the HA partner, then remove the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

1 months ago

We can make the node ineligible first, then remove it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

1 months ago

Let's check if high availability is configured before removing the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

2 months ago

Option C is interesting, but moving Epsilon might not be necessary if you're just removing a single node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

2 months ago

Hmm, Option D doesn't sound right. Removing a node without proper preparation could disrupt the cluster's quorum.

upvoted 0 times

Henriette

25 days ago

User4: User3, I think you're right. Option D doesn't sound safe. Removing the node without electing a new master could cause issues with quorum.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colene

27 days ago

User3: I'm not sure about Option C. Moving Epsilon to cluster1-02 before removing the node might not be the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ammie

1 months ago

I agree with you, User1. Option B also seems like a necessary step to make the node ineligible before removing it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamaria

2 months ago

I think Option A is the correct one. We should verify high availability before removing the node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

2 months ago

I think Option B is the correct answer. Making the node ineligible before removing it seems like the safest approach.

upvoted 0 times

Audry

2 months ago

So, we should go with option B then?

upvoted 0 times

...

Harris

2 months ago

Definitely, it's always best to take precautions before removing a node.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sena

2 months ago

I agree, making the node ineligible first seems like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curt

3 months ago

I believe option D is also correct. After removing the node, the cluster needs to elect a new master to maintain quorum.

upvoted 0 times

...

Essie

3 months ago

I agree with Georgeanna. Option B doesn't make sense because we should remove the node after ensuring failover to the HA partner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

3 months ago

I think option A is correct because we need to ensure high availability before removing the node.

upvoted 0 times

...