Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-194 Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 3

[All NS0-194 Questions]

Your Windows clients were able to access your CIFS SVM yesterday. Today they are no longer able to access the CIFS SVM on your NetApp cluster. Your IT security team just pushed out a new group policy to enhance security.

In this scenario, which statement is true?

AYour CIFS SVM is not using DNS.

BYour CIFS SVM is configured to use SMBv1 and SMBv2.

CYour CIFS SVM is configured for NFSv3 access.

DYour CIFS SVM is configured for the wrong domain.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Domitila at Aug 22, 2024, 08:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jules

2 months ago

I bet the IT team is kicking themselves right now. They probably forgot to update the CIFS SVM's domain settings when they pushed out that new policy. Classic IT blunder!

upvoted 0 times

Elden

1 months ago

Definitely a classic IT blunder. It happens to the best of us!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pok

1 months ago

Yeah, it sounds like they overlooked that detail. Hopefully they can quickly fix the domain settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

2 months ago

D) Your CIFS SVM is configured for the wrong domain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renay

2 months ago

B) Your CIFS SVM is configured to use SMBv1 and SMBv2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

2 months ago

A) Your CIFS SVM is not using DNS.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Katina

2 months ago

This one's a head-scratcher. Wait, is that a cricket I hear in the background? Someone needs to clean up the exam room, this place is a mess!

upvoted 0 times

...

Aja

2 months ago

Option B seems a bit too obvious. My money's on D - those pesky domain settings can really mess things up when you least expect it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

3 months ago

Definitely not C, NFS doesn't have anything to do with CIFS. I'd say it's either B or D, but I'm leaning more towards D.

upvoted 0 times

Shelton

2 months ago

Agreed, D seems like the most likely option in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

2 months ago

Yeah, that makes sense. It's probably D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

2 months ago

I think it's D, the CIFS SVM might be configured for the wrong domain.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Delpha

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm guessing it's option D. That new security policy must have changed the CIFS SVM's domain configuration somehow.

upvoted 0 times

Paola

1 months ago

Good idea, let's investigate further to see if that's the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

2 months ago

Maybe we should check the domain settings on the CIFS SVM to confirm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rana

2 months ago

Yeah, the domain configuration could have been affected by the new security policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noe

2 months ago

I think you're right, option D seems like the most likely reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Annamae

3 months ago

I think the answer is D) Your CIFS SVM is configured for the wrong domain, as that could also cause access issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lakeesha

3 months ago

But wouldn't a new group policy affecting security make option A more likely?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Your CIFS SVM is configured to use SMBv1 and SMBv2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lakeesha

4 months ago

I think the answer is A) Your CIFS SVM is not using DNS.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77