Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-194 Topic 4 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 4
[All NS0-194 Questions]

For testing purposes, your customer decides to use FC on a single-node ONTAP cluster. There is only one host that the customer expects to use. High availability is not a concern for this test. The customer connects the host directly to the ONTAP node. The LUN is set up, and the igroup is configured. When the customer tries to attach to the LUN from the host, the LUN is not seen by the host.

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leonardo
4 months ago
Wait, hold up. Did the question mention anything about a unicorn? Because if not, I'm not sure I can trust this scenario. You know what they say, no unicorns, no problem.
upvoted 0 times
Shanice
2 months ago
D) An FC switch must be used with ONTAP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
2 months ago
C) NPIV must be enabled on the host before trying to attach to the LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
3 months ago
B) NPV must be enabled on the host before trying to attach to the LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
A) Multipathing must be used and connected to another FC path.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loise
4 months ago
I think D) An FC switch must be used with ONTAP is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
4 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost here. Maybe I should have paid more attention in FC class. Or maybe I should just guess and hope for the best. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct statement is A) Multipathing must be used and connected to another FC path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
4 months ago
D, for sure. An FC switch must be used with ONTAP. How else are they supposed to communicate? This is a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
4 months ago
Nah, I'm going with B. NPV must be enabled on the host. Who needs NPIV when you've got NPV, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
In
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D might also be a valid option. An FC switch could be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
3 months ago
I'm with you on this one, B is the way to go. NPV is the key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe B is the correct statement. NPV must be enabled on the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
4 months ago
I think C is the correct statement. NPIV must be enabled on the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bethanie
5 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. NPIV must be enabled on the host before trying to attach to the LUN. Seems straightforward enough.
upvoted 0 times
Alisha
3 months ago
So, enabling NPIV would allow the host to see the LUN on the ONTAP node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
3 months ago
That makes sense. NPIV allows multiple virtual ports to share a single physical port.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
I think the answer is C. NPIV must be enabled on the host before trying to attach to the LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
5 months ago
I think the correct statement is C) NPIV must be enabled on the host before trying to attach to the LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77