Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-521 Topic 6 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-521 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 6
[All NS0-521 Questions]

A customer has a two-node NetApp ONTAP cluster that Is hosting FC LUNs for 64 SAN hosts. An administrator is tasked to add 40 more hosts to the environment.

What two actions would the administrator need to take to avoid potential performance problems with the environment? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

When adding 40 more hosts to a two-node NetApp ONTAP cluster that is already hosting 64 SAN hosts, the following actions are necessary to avoid potential performance problems:

Configure additional FC target ports: Increasing the number of Fibre Channel (FC) target ports on the storage nodes will help distribute the I/O load more evenly, reducing the risk of bottlenecks.

Configure additional SAN LIFs: Adding more SAN Logical Interfaces (LIFs) will ensure that the increased number of hosts can connect efficiently, improving load balancing and path management.

These actions help maintain optimal performance and prevent congestion in the SAN environment.

For more detailed guidance, refer to:

NetApp SAN Host Configuration Overview

NetApp Best Practices for SAN (NetApp) (NetApp)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lamonica
3 months ago
I think both options are valid. We should consider implementing both for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
3 months ago
I believe configuring additional SAN LIFs would also be beneficial to avoid performance problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
3 months ago
B and C for sure. Gotta spread that traffic out like butter on toast!
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
3 months ago
C) Configure additional SAN LIFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
3 months ago
B) Configure additional FC target ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keshia
3 months ago
I agree with Lashawn. That would help distribute the workload better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
3 months ago
I think we should configure additional FC ports on existing hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
3 months ago
Option D is a bit like turning it off and on again, but hey, if it works, it works!
upvoted 0 times
Tamala
3 months ago
A: Sounds good. Let's make sure we avoid any potential performance problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
3 months ago
B: Agreed. We should also configure additional SAN LIFs to handle the increased load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
3 months ago
A: I think we should configure additional FC target ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verdell
3 months ago
I think both options are valid. We should consider implementing both for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
4 months ago
A and B. More FC ports on the hosts and more target ports on the cluster. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
2 months ago
B) Configure additional FC target ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
3 months ago
A) Configure additional FC ports on existing hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
4 months ago
I'd go with B and D. More target ports and higher queue depth should give us the needed performance boost.
upvoted 0 times
Vivienne
3 months ago
C) Configure additional SAN LIFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
3 months ago
B) Configure additional FC target ports, D) Configure a higher queue depth on the target ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haley
4 months ago
I believe configuring additional SAN LIFs would also be beneficial for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
4 months ago
I agree with Adolph. That would help distribute the load better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
4 months ago
Hmm, D is an interesting one. Increasing the queue depth could help improve performance, but I'd want to make sure the hosts can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
4 months ago
I think we should configure additional FC ports on existing hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
4 months ago
B and C seem like the obvious choices here. Adding more FC ports and LIFs will help distribute the load across the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
Edwin
3 months ago
Agreed. It's important to avoid potential performance problems when adding more hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
That makes sense. More ports and LIFs should help balance the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
3 months ago
C) Configure additional SAN LIFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
4 months ago
B) Configure additional FC target ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77