Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-527 Topic 4 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 4
[All NS0-527 Questions]

You want to conserve disk space in your SnapVault destinations. You enable storage efficiency on each of the secondary volumes.

Which two statements are true in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gaston
2 months ago
I'm going to go with C and D. If storage efficiency is enabled on the primary volume, it will be preserved on the secondary volume, and SnapVault does use storage efficiency. I mean, who wants to manage storage efficiency manually? That's like trying to herd cats!
upvoted 0 times
Tamie
29 days ago
Agreed, manual management would be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
Exactly! It's much easier to let SnapVault handle storage efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
1 months ago
D) SnapVault implicitly uses storage efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 months ago
C) If storage efficiency is enabled on the primary volume, it will be preserved on the secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christa
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to say A and D. Storage efficiency can be enabled on the secondary volume, and SnapVault does handle it automatically. Why would anyone want to manually schedule storage efficiency? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with B and C. Storage efficiency can be enabled on the secondary volume, but it won't be preserved from the primary volume. You'll need to manage the schedule yourself.
upvoted 0 times
Tracey
21 days ago
So, it's important to remember to set up the schedule for storage efficiency on each secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
27 days ago
That's correct. If it's enabled on the primary volume, it won't automatically transfer to the secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
28 days ago
I think you're right. Storage efficiency needs to be managed manually on the secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
I'm not sure about D, but I'm confident that A and B are true. Storage efficiency can be enabled on the secondary volume, and you'll need to set a manual schedule if you don't want SnapVault to handle it.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
28 days ago
D is not true. SnapVault does not implicitly use storage efficiency. So, A and B are the correct statements in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
2 months ago
I agree with you. B is also true. If you want to set a manual schedule, you can enable storage efficiency on the secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
I think A is correct. SnapVault will manage the schedule when storage efficiency is enabled on the secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Richelle
2 months ago
I'm not sure about B and C, but I think A and D make sense for conserving disk space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
3 months ago
I think the correct answers are A and D. Storage efficiency can be enabled on the secondary volume and SnapVault will manage the schedule, and SnapVault does use storage efficiency implicitly.
upvoted 0 times
Gerardo
2 months ago
Great, so enabling storage efficiency on the secondary volume with SnapVault is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 months ago
Yes, D is also correct. SnapVault does use storage efficiency implicitly to conserve disk space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
I agree, A is correct. SnapVault will manage the schedule for storage efficiency on the secondary volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearline
3 months ago
I agree with Haley. I also think D is true because SnapVault implicitly uses storage efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
3 months ago
I think A is true because SnapVault will manage the schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77