Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-604 Topic 2 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-604 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 2
[All NS0-604 Questions]

A company has SMB shares in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP in Azure. They need a local copy of the Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares in a globally accessible file system on their Microsoft Windows Servers 2022.

Which NetApp solution should the company use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To provide a local copy of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares in a globally accessible file system on Microsoft Windows Servers 2022, BlueXP Edge Caching is the ideal solution. BlueXP Edge Caching allows users to cache frequently accessed data from centralized Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares at distributed locations, ensuring fast, local access while keeping the central storage synchronized.

BlueXP Tiering (A) is for moving cold data to lower-cost storage, BlueXP Copy and Sync (B) is for data migration and synchronization, and FlexCache (D) is primarily for caching in ONTAP environments but is not optimized for global accessibility in the Windows Server context.


Contribute your Thoughts:

An
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I mean, who doesn't love a good trick question? But I think BlueXP copy and sync is the way to go. It's the most straightforward solution and fits the requirements perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of 'which NetApp solution should I use?' It's like trying to pick between ice cream flavors - they're all delicious, but you gotta choose one. I'd go with BlueXP copy and sync, it's the vanilla of the bunch, but it gets the job done.
upvoted 0 times
Linn
1 months ago
Casie: Yeah, it's reliable and gets the job done efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
1 months ago
User 3: I think BlueXP copy and sync is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 months ago
User 2: What about FlexCache in ONTAP? Would that work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 months ago
I agree, BlueXP copy and sync is a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but BlueXP copy and sync could also be a good option for creating a local copy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
2 months ago
I agree with Josefa, FlexCache in ONTAP would be the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
2 months ago
BlueXP edge caching could work, but it's more about caching than creating a local copy. I'd go with the BlueXP copy and sync option to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
1 months ago
BlueXP tiering might not be the best fit for creating a local copy in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
1 months ago
FlexCache in ONTAP could also be a good choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
1 months ago
I agree, BlueXP copy and sync seems like the best option for creating a local copy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josefa
2 months ago
I think the company should use FlexCache in ONTAP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
2 months ago
FlexCache in ONTAP sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if it's the best option for this scenario. The question specifically mentions a local copy, and FlexCache is more about caching, right?
upvoted 0 times
Suzan
1 months ago
User1: Agreed, let's go with BlueXP copy and sync for creating a local copy of the shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
BlueXP copy and sync does sound like it would fit the scenario better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
2 months ago
Maybe BlueXP copy and sync would be a better option for creating a local copy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
2 months ago
I think you're right, FlexCache is more about caching data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giovanna
3 months ago
I think BlueXP copy and sync is the way to go. It makes a local copy of the Cloud Volumes ONTAP shares, which is exactly what the company needs. Plus, it's globally accessible, so everyone can access it.
upvoted 0 times
Amie
1 months ago
BlueXP tiering is not the best solution for this situation. BlueXP copy and sync is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
2 months ago
BlueXP edge caching might not be the right choice since the company needs a local copy of the shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
2 months ago
FlexCache in ONTAP could also work, but I think BlueXP copy and sync is more suitable for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
2 months ago
I agree, BlueXP copy and sync is the best option for creating a local copy of the shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77