Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope Exam NSK200 Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 3
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your customer has some managed Windows-based endpoints where they cannot add any clients or agents. For their users to have secure access to their SaaS application, you suggest that the customer use Netskope's Explicit Proxy.

Which two configurations are supported for this use case? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

For the use case of managed Windows-based endpoints where no clients or agents can be added, you can suggest that the customer use Netskope's Explicit Proxy. Explicit Proxy is a method for steering traffic from any device to the Netskope Cloud using a proxy server. There are two supported configurations for this use case: Endpoints can be configured to directly use the Netskope proxy by setting the proxy settings in the browser or the operating system to point to the explicit proxy destination provided by Netskope. Endpoints can be configured to use a Proxy Auto Configuration (PAC) file by downloading a PAC file template from Netskope and modifying it according to the customer's needs. The PAC file can be hosted on-premises or on the cloud and distributed to the endpoints. The other options are not valid for this use case. Endpoints do not need separate steering configurations in the tenant settings, as they can use the same explicit proxy destination and port.Endpoints do not need to be configured in the device section of the tenant to interoperate with all proxies, as this is only required for reverse proxy mode.Reference:Explicit Proxy3, [Explicit Proxy over IPSec and GRE Tunnels]


by Karol at Jul 12, 2024, 06:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Buck
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the IT team is loving the idea of having to configure all the endpoints just to access a SaaS app. Option A or D is definitely the way to go, less hassle for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
Dahlia
3 months ago
Yeah, the IT team will definitely appreciate the simplicity of those configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
3 months ago
I agree, Option D with a PAC file would also be a good option for easier setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
3 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice, direct configuration is much simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katlyn
4 months ago
Configuring the endpoints in the device section of the tenant? That sounds a bit overkill. I'd stick with the simpler options A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
4 months ago
Option B seems a bit more complicated, having to set up separate steering configurations. I'm not sure that's the best solution for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
3 months ago
D) Endpoints can be configured to use a Proxy Auto Configuration (PAC) file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
3 months ago
A) Endpoints can be configured to directly use the Netskope proxy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
4 months ago
I think options A and D are the way to go. Configuring the endpoints to directly use the Netskope proxy or a PAC file seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Delila
4 months ago
It's important to have a straightforward approach for secure access, so options A and D are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
4 months ago
Using a PAC file for configuration also seems like a good option to ensure secure access to the SaaS application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
4 months ago
I agree, configuring the endpoints to directly use the Netskope proxy would simplify the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
4 months ago
I'm not sure about option B and option C. Can someone explain why they are not the correct configurations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
4 months ago
I agree with Kimi. Option A allows endpoints to directly use the Netskope proxy, and option D allows for configuration with a PAC file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
5 months ago
I think option A and option D are the supported configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77