Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope Exam NSK200 Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 3
[All NSK200 Questions]

You are an administrator writing Netskope Real-time Protection policies and must determine proper policy ordering.

Which two statements are true in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

To determine proper policy ordering for Netskope Real-time Protection policies, you need to follow these two statements: B. You do not need to create an ''allow all'' Web Access policy at the bottom. D. You must place high-risk block policies at the top.These statements are based on the best practices for policy ordering recommended by Netskope3. An ''allow all'' Web Access policy at the bottom is not necessary because any traffic that does not match any policy will be allowed by default.However, you can create a ''monitor all'' Web Access policy at the bottom if you want to log all the traffic that is not matched by any other policy4. High-risk block policies at the top are important because they prevent any traffic that poses a serious threat or violates a critical compliance standard from reaching its destination.These policies should have higher priority than other policies that may allow or modify the traffic5. Therefore, options B and D are correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:Real-time Protection Policies - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Create a Real-time Protection Policy for Web Categories - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Best Practices: Real-time Protection Policies (1 of 2) - Netskope


by Deonna at Sep 15, 2024, 02:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Levi
2 months ago
Haha, this exam is like a maze of policies! I'm going with B and D. No 'allow all' policy, and the high-risk blocks better be at the top or it's game over. Netskope doesn't mess around!
upvoted 0 times
Teri
28 days ago
I'm not sure about A, but I know for sure that 'allow all' policy is not needed at the bottom.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
1 months ago
I agree, B and D are the way to go. Can't risk missing any high-risk blocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 months ago
I think C is important too, DLP policies should definitely be at the bottom.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nichelle
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about A. Putting the malware policies in the middle doesn't seem right to me. I'd go with B and D - no 'allow all' and high-risk blocks at the top. Gotta keep that network secure!
upvoted 0 times
Benedict
2 months ago
Definitely, better to be safe than sorry when it comes to network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
2 months ago
I think skipping the 'allow all' policy makes sense to avoid any unnecessary risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
I agree, having high-risk block policies at the top is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
2 months ago
Yeah, it's important to prioritize blocking high-risk threats first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dudley
3 months ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one! I'm going with C and D. DLP policies at the bottom to catch everything, and high-risk blocks at the top to keep the bad stuff out. But B sounds right too - no need for that 'allow all' policy.
upvoted 0 times
Shizue
2 months ago
I agree, let's go with C and D for the policy ordering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
Yeah, that's a good point. B does seem unnecessary with the other policies in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
2 months ago
I think you're right, C and D make sense. DLP at the bottom and high-risk blocks at the top.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kara
3 months ago
But what about DLP policies? Shouldn't we place them at the bottom to catch any data leaks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
I agree with Fausto. It makes sense to prioritize blocking high-risk activities first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
3 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. You don't need an 'allow all' policy at the bottom since that would override all your other policies. And the high-risk block policies should definitely be at the top to catch those threats first.
upvoted 0 times
Veronica
2 months ago
No, DLP policies should be placed before high-risk block policies for better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
2 months ago
So, we should place DLP policies at the bottom then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
2 months ago
Definitely, having an 'allow all' policy at the bottom would defeat the purpose of other policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
2 months ago
I agree, placing high-risk block policies at the top is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
3 months ago
I think we should place high-risk block policies at the top.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77