Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope Exam NSK200 Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your customer is migrating all of their applications over to Microsoft 365 and Azure. They have good practices and policies in place (or their inline traffic, but they want to continuously detect reconfigurations and enforce compliance standards.

Which two solutions would satisfy their requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dominque
2 months ago
Option D is a no-brainer, but I'm torn between A and B. Maybe I should just ask Clippy for advice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
2 months ago
As a certified cloud security expert, I can confidently say D and A are the correct answers. Netskope knows their stuff when it comes to SaaS security.
upvoted 0 times
Thora
1 months ago
Thanks for the insight, I will recommend these solutions to my customer for their migration to Microsoft 365 and Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 months ago
Netskope Continuous Security Assessment and Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management are top choices for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
1 months ago
I agree, D and A are the best options for continuous detection and enforcement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
2 months ago
Hmm, I think D and C are the way to go. Risk Insights could help them identify and mitigate any potential security vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I'm going with D and B. The Cloud Confidence Index could be a great way to assess their overall security posture across Microsoft 365 and Azure.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
1 months ago
It's important to have tools in place that can continuously monitor and assess the security posture of their applications in Microsoft 365 and Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
1 months ago
Using Netskope Continuous Security Assessment and Netskope Cloud Confidence Index together would provide a comprehensive solution for their needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 months ago
I agree, D and B seem like the best options for continuous detection and enforcement of compliance standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuonne
2 months ago
I'm not sure about B) Netskope Cloud Confidence Index, but C) Netskope Risk Insights could also be useful for detecting reconfigurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 months ago
I agree with Alishia, but I also think D) Netskope Continuous Security Assessment is important for enforcing compliance standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
3 months ago
I think A) Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management would be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
3 months ago
D and A sound like the best solutions to continuously monitor and enforce compliance. Netskope's tools seem tailored for the customer's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
2 months ago
I agree, D and A would provide the continuous monitoring and enforcement needed for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
3 months ago
D and A are definitely the way to go. Netskope's tools are perfect for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77