Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope Exam NSK300 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All NSK300 Questions]

You are building an architecture plan to roll out Netskope for on-premises devices. You determine that tunnels are the best way to achieve this task due to a lack of support for explicit proxy in some instances and IPsec is the right type of tunnel to achieve the desired security and steering.

What are three valid elements that you must consider when using IPsec tunnels in this scenario? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

When using IPsec tunnels, especially in the context of deploying Netskope for on-premises devices, several factors must be considered to ensure a secure and efficient architecture:

Cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices (A): It is crucial to ensure that the devices initiating the IPsec tunnels support the ciphers used by Netskope. This compatibility is necessary for establishing secure connections.

Bandwidth considerations (B): The bandwidth available for the IPsec tunnels will affect the data throughput and performance of the connection. Adequate bandwidth must be allocated to handle the expected traffic without causing bottlenecks.

The impact of threat scanning performance (D): The performance of threat scanning can be affected by the encryption and decryption processes in IPsec tunnels. It is important to consider how the threat scanning capabilities will perform under the additional load of encrypted traffic.

These elements are essential for the successful implementation of IPsec tunnels in a Netskope architecture plan for on-premises devices12.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sarina
4 months ago
Netskope Client behavior on-premises? Yup, gotta make sure that works seamlessly, or the whole thing falls apart.
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
3 months ago
E) Netskope Client behavior when on-premises
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
3 months ago
B) bandwidth considerations
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
3 months ago
E) Netskope Client behavior when on-premises
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
3 months ago
A) cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
3 months ago
B) bandwidth considerations
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
3 months ago
A) cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
4 months ago
Ha! The threat scanning performance impact is like the elephant in the room. Better not forget that one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
4 months ago
The categories to be blocked are a key element. Netskope's whole purpose is content filtering, so that's a must-have.
upvoted 0 times
Herman
3 months ago
E) Netskope Client behavior when on-premises
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
3 months ago
C) the categories to be blocked
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
3 months ago
A) cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarita
5 months ago
Bandwidth is crucial here - gotta make sure the tunnels can handle the traffic without bogging down the network.
upvoted 0 times
Kristeen
4 months ago
D) the impact of threat scanning performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
4 months ago
B) bandwidth considerations
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
5 months ago
A) cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chan
5 months ago
Definitely need to consider the cipher support on the tunnel-initiating devices. Can't have outdated encryption crippling the whole setup.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
4 months ago
D) the impact of threat scanning performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
4 months ago
B) bandwidth considerations
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
4 months ago
A) cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Long
5 months ago
I believe the impact of threat scanning performance is important to take into account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
5 months ago
Bandwidth considerations are also crucial for IPsec tunnels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
I think we should consider cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77