Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope Exam NSK300 Topic 2 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 2
[All NSK300 Questions]

You created a Real-time Protection policy that blocks all activities to non-corporate S3 buckets, but determine that the policy is too restrictive. Specifically, users are complaining that normal websites have stopped rendering properly.

How would you solve this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Yolande
14 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Keeping things simple and targeted is the key to a successful security policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
19 days ago
Option B, for sure. It's the most targeted approach to address the issue without compromising the overall security posture.
upvoted 0 times
Angelyn
3 days ago
User 1: I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renay
26 days ago
Definitely Option B. Allowing the Browse activity to the Cloud Storage category is the most logical choice to solve this problem without over-permissioning.
upvoted 0 times
Ronald
2 days ago
Let's go ahead and implement that change then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 days ago
That should definitely help with the website rendering issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
16 days ago
Agreed, allowing Browse activity to the Cloud Storage category makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
17 days ago
I think Option B is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
1 months ago
I'd go with Option B as well. Blocking all non-corporate S3 buckets is a bit too extreme, and Option B should provide a more balanced solution.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, blocking all non-corporate S3 buckets is too extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
14 days ago
User 3: Option B should provide a more balanced solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
25 days ago
User 1: I think we should go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
1 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Allowing the Browse activity to the Cloud Storage category should fix the rendering issues without compromising the overall security policy.
upvoted 0 times
Darell
7 days ago
Definitely, finding that balance is key. It's great that there are options to adjust the policy to fit our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
14 days ago
I think that's the best approach. It's important to balance security with usability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
23 days ago
I agree, that sounds like a good solution. It will give users the access they need without opening up too many risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
28 days ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Allowing the Browse activity to the Cloud Storage category should fix the rendering issues without compromising the overall security policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawna
2 months ago
I agree with Britt, option A seems like the most appropriate choice to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 months ago
I think option A is the best solution because it allows browsing activity to the Amazon S3 application.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77