Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope Exam NSK300 Topic 6 Question 16 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lai
2 months ago
Option C all the way! It's like the Netskope client is playing a game of 'hide and seek' with Google Drive, and it's always one step ahead.
upvoted 0 times
Willetta
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C as well. It just makes sense with how Netskope and Google Drive are interacting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
2 months ago
I think option A might also be a possibility, but option C does seem more likely based on the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the right choice. Netskope client is definitely on top of its game.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
I think Option C is the right answer. The log clearly shows the Netskope client intercepting and tunneling the connection to Google Drive, just as the question describes.
upvoted 0 times
Lucille
1 months ago
Option C is the best choice, it aligns with using Chrome and Netskope Client to tunnel Google Drive traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
1 months ago
That's right, the log file in Option C matches the scenario described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 months ago
Yes, the image in Option C clearly shows Netskope client tunneling the connection to Google Drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
1 months ago
I agree, Option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
2 months ago
Option C is the best choice here. It aligns perfectly with the setup of using Chrome and Netskope Client to tunnel traffic to Google Drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
Yes, Option C is the correct answer. It clearly demonstrates the scenario described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
I agree, Option C shows the Netskope client intercepting and tunneling the connection to Google Drive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keshia
3 months ago
I believe option D could also be a valid answer based on the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C might also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
3 months ago
Haha, this question is a piece of cake! Option C is the way to go. I can almost hear the Netskope client chuckling in the background, saying 'Caught you, Google Drive!'
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
2 months ago
I think you're right, Option C seems like the most logical answer. Netskope is a sneaky one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
2 months ago
I agree, Option C is definitely the correct choice. Netskope is always on the lookout!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
3 months ago
I agree with Hyun, option A seems like the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
3 months ago
I think we should look for option A in the log file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
3 months ago
Option C definitely looks like the correct answer. I can see the CONNECT request to the Google Drive domain, which is exactly what I would expect to see in the log file.
upvoted 0 times
Bernadine
2 months ago
Yes, Option C is the correct answer. It confirms that the traffic is being steered to Netskope through the CONNECT request in the log file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
3 months ago
I agree, Option C shows the CONNECT request to Google Drive domain, indicating traffic is being tunneled to Netskope.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77