Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCM-MCI-5.15 Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCM-MCI-5.15 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 5
[All NCM-MCI-5.15 Questions]

A customer has a Nutanix cluster with 10Gb connectivity via switch fabric extenders. The administrator receives NCC health check errors of latency greater than 200ms.

Which action should the administrator take to resolve the NCC errors?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by James at Apr 10, 2024, 06:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCM-MCI-5.15 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sue
12 months ago
Yeah, I believe bond state and network latency play a bigger role in addressing these issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
1 years ago
I don't think the number of NICs connected has a significant impact on cluster performance compared to bond state and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
1 years ago
But what about the number of NICs connected? Could that also be a factor?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 years ago
I agree with Asha, those parameters are key to correcting high IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
1 years ago
I think we should focus on bond state and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 years ago
Hmm, that might also impact performance. Good point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
1 years ago
I would go with C) Number of NICs connected and frame size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
1 years ago
But bond state is important for load balancing and fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's B) Number of NICs connected and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
1 years ago
I think the answer is A) Bond State and network latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 years ago
Yeah, Option B sounds like the most logical choice. Increasing the number of NICs can help with load balancing and redundancy, which could help address the high IOPs and latency issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Increasing the number of NICs can help distribute the network traffic and potentially improve performance. And network latency is definitely a factor to consider here.
upvoted 0 times
Sharee
1 years ago
Exactly, optimizing both parameters can help resolve the issue with high cluster IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 years ago
So, it's a combination of increasing NICs and managing network latency for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
1 years ago
Yes, network latency can contribute to high cluster IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 years ago
Don't forget about network latency, that's an important factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
1 years ago
Agreed, having more NICs connected can definitely improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
1 years ago
Option B seems like a good choice. More NICs can help with traffic distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
1 years ago
Okay, let's break this down. Option A mentions bond state and network latency, which could be relevant. Option B talks about the number of NICs and network latency, which also seems like a potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 years ago
I agree. Based on the options, it seems like we need to look at the parameters that can impact network performance and potentially address the high IOPs and latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 years ago
You're right, that's a good observation. Networking is the suspected issue, so the answer should be related to network configuration parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 years ago
Hmm, this question is a bit tricky. It's definitely testing our understanding of Nutanix cluster networking parameters. I think the key here is to focus on the specific problem mentioned - high cluster IOPs and Cluster Controller Latency.
upvoted 0 times
Margarita
1 years ago
I think so. It seems to address both issues of high cluster IOPs and Cluster Controller Latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
1 years ago
So, would option B) Number of NICs connected and network latency be the correct choice then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 years ago
Yes, I agree. But we also need to consider the network latency as mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
1 years ago
I think the networking parameters we need to configure are related to the number of NICs connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77