Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-DB Topic 1 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-DB exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 1
[All NCP-DB Questions]

When trying to restore a database via Time Machine (TM), the option to restore data to a Point in Time is not available.

What should the administrator do to enable Point in Time Recovery?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Paris
5 months ago
Using Brass SLA and updating the Log catch up frequency may be necessary for enabling Point in Time Recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
5 months ago
Taking a Manual snapshot and using it for DB recovery is also a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
5 months ago
Another option could be to update the TM schedule to perform DB Log catch up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
6 months ago
I agree with Lourdes. Continuous Log retention would allow for Point in Time Recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
6 months ago
I think the administrator should use an SLA that supports Continuous Log retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
6 months ago
Using Brass SLA & updating the Log catch up frequency could be another option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
6 months ago
But what about updating the TM schedule to perform DB Log catch up?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
7 months ago
I agree with User1, Continuous Log retention can help enable Point in Time Recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
7 months ago
I think the administrator should use an SLA that supports Continuous Log retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
8 months ago
Well, if it's on the exam, we'd better take it seriously. I'm going to go with option A. Continuous log retention sounds like the most reliable way to ensure we can restore to a specific point in time if needed. Gotta cover all our bases, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
8 months ago
Okay, so the question is saying that the Point in Time Recovery option is not available when trying to restore a database from Time Machine. That's a bit of a head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
8 months ago
User4
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
8 months ago
User3
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
8 months ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
8 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxanne
8 months ago
Hold up, are we talking about Time Machine here? I thought that was just for my Mac to back up my cat photos, not for enterprise databases. This is getting complicated!
upvoted 0 times
Sherell
6 months ago
No, we should use Brass SLA and update the Log catch up frequency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
6 months ago
Should we also update the TM schedule to perform DB Log catch up?
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
6 months ago
That makes sense. It ensures we have all the necessary logs for recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
6 months ago
To enable Point in Time Recovery, we should use an SLA that supports Continuous Log retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
6 months ago
I didn't know Time Machine could be used for databases too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
6 months ago
Yes, we are talking about using Time Machine for database recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77