Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-DS Topic 4 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-DS exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 4
[All NCP-DS Questions]

While preparing for migrating data from a legacy storage environment to a new Files scaleout file server, the administrator make the following notes

Requirements

* Number of home directories: 4000

* Number of Departmental shares: 1

* Everyone is permitted to accessing it

* All users use the same Departmental share

The administrator deploys Files using the following configuration:

* Number of FSVMS: 3

* VCPU & RAM/FSVM: 4vCPU,12GB

* One Distributed share & ABE enabled for

* One Standard share for the Departmental share

Does this configuration satisfy the project's requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joesph
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure I'd trust a setup that can't handle 4,000 home directories and a departmental share. Seems like a classic case of 'underpowered and undercooked' to me.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
3 months ago
Hmm, I agree. This setup doesn't seem to meet the requirements for 4000 home directories and a departmental share.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
3 months ago
B) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMS, 6 VCPU & 32GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
4 months ago
A) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMs, 24 vCPU & 128GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
C) No, the project needs 4 FSVMS, 4 VCPU & 12GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 months ago
B) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMS, 6 VCPU & 32GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
4 months ago
A) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMs, 24 vCPU & 128GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lakeesha
5 months ago
Let's double-check the project's requirements to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
But option D says it satisfies the requirements, maybe we missed something.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
5 months ago
I agree, option A seems to have the right specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
This question is making me hungry. I could really go for a nice distributed share right about now, with a side of ABE-enabled goodness. Mmm, delicious!
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
4 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
4 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Destiny
5 months ago
I agree with the previous comment. The RAM and vCPU might be a bit tight, especially with everyone accessing the departmental share. I'd go for the higher-spec option just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
5 months ago
I think the configuration needs to be adjusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
5 months ago
The configuration seems to be on the right track, but I'm not sure if the RAM and vCPU allocations are sufficient for 4,000 home directories and a departmental share. Maybe we need a bit more horsepower.
upvoted 0 times
Micah
4 months ago
A) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMs, 24 vCPU & 128GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
4 months ago
I agree, the current setup might not be enough for the number of directories and shares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
4 months ago
B) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMS, 6 VCPU & 32GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
4 months ago
The configuration might need some adjustments to handle the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
4 months ago
A) No, the project needs two distributed shares, 4 FSVMs, 24 vCPU & 128GB RAM
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77