Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-US Topic 5 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-US exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 5
[All NCP-US Questions]

A team of developers are working on a new processing application and requires a solution where they can upload the ... code for testing API calls. Older iterations should be retained as newer code is developer and tested.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Nutanix Objects supports versioning, which is a feature that allows multiple versions of an object to be preserved in the same bucket. Versioning can be useful for developers who need to upload their code for testing API calls and retain older iterations as newer code is developed and tested. Versioning can also provide protection against accidental deletion or overwrite of objects. Reference: Nutanix Objects Administration Guide


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mariann
5 months ago
D) all the way! Versioning is the secret sauce to keeping your developers sane. Plus, it's way more fun to say 'object storage' than 'SMB share'.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
4 months ago
Daren: Definitely, it's more efficient and organized than using an SMB share.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
4 months ago
I agree, object storage seems like the way to go for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
4 months ago
That sounds like a good idea, versioning is important for keeping track of changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
4 months ago
Let's go with option D, create a bucket in Objects with Versioning enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casie
5 months ago
If I had a nickel for every time I've had to deal with iSCSI, I'd be a rich developer. D) is the clear winner here, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
3 months ago
Quentin is right, D) is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
4 months ago
D) Create a bucket in Objects with Versioning enabled sounds like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
4 months ago
I agree, dealing with iSCSI can be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
4 months ago
I prefer C) because it allows for easy access to the code on a Linux server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
4 months ago
I think A) could also work well if they need to easily access previous versions of the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
4 months ago
I agree, D) is definitely the best option for retaining older iterations of code.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nada
5 months ago
I think option D is the most scalable solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
Hold up, is that a trick question? I mean, who still uses SMB shares these days? D) all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
5 months ago
I believe option C is the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the other options, but D) sounds like the most straightforward solution. Gotta love that object versioning!
upvoted 0 times
Earlean
4 months ago
Renay: Let's go with D) then, it's the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
4 months ago
I agree, it's a clean and efficient way to handle code versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
4 months ago
Yeah, object versioning seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
I think D) is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doretha
5 months ago
I prefer option B because it provides better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
5 months ago
I think option A sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
6 months ago
D) Create a bucket in Objects with Versioning enabled. That's the way to go! Keeping track of older versions is crucial for testing and troubleshooting.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
5 months ago
Good idea, that way we can keep track of older versions for testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
5 months ago
Let's create a bucket in Objects with Versioning enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77