Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCS-Core Topic 1 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCS-Core exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 1
[All NCS-Core Questions]

A consultant is deploying a new Nutanix cluster. The nodes have the following network interfaces.

2x 10G NICS

2x 25G NICS

The consultant is using the default virtual switch configurations for AHV. After creating 10 VMs, the consultant observes inconsistent network speeds from the VMs on the AHV host.

What should the consultant do to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To resolve inconsistent network speeds from the VMs on an AHV host equipped with both 10G and 25G NICs, the consultant should configure all network interfaces with Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) on the same virtual switch. This configuration will allow for better load balancing and bandwidth aggregation across multiple network interfaces, improving overall network throughput and reducing bottlenecks. Reference:

Nutanix University - NCS-Core 6.8 Learning Path

The Nutanix Bible, Networking chapter (https://www.nutanixbible.com/)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Claudia
5 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Configuring LACP on a single virtual switch is the most efficient way to utilize all the available network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Yolande
4 months ago
I agree, LACP will help balance the network traffic across all interfaces for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
4 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Configuring LACP on a single virtual switch is the most efficient way to utilize all the available network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
5 months ago
I agree, LACP will help in load balancing and redundancy for the network interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Configuring LACP on a single virtual switch is the most efficient way to utilize all the available network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Page
6 months ago
Haha, I bet the consultant is scratching their head trying to figure this out. D is definitely the way to go to get those VMs humming along nicely!
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
6 months ago
I agree with Whitney. D is the correct answer as it allows for load balancing and redundancy across all the available network interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
5 months ago
Yes, D is the correct answer for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
5 months ago
I agree, D allows for load balancing and redundancy which is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
5 months ago
I think D is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherita
6 months ago
I agree with Giovanna. Load balancing would help distribute the network traffic evenly and improve the network speeds for the VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
6 months ago
Option D seems the most logical choice here. Configuring LACP on all the network interfaces in the same virtual switch will help distribute the load evenly and provide consistent network speeds.
upvoted 0 times
Adelle
5 months ago
Agreed, LACP will help balance the network traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
5 months ago
I think option D is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
5 months ago
Agreed, configuring LACP on all the network interfaces will definitely help with consistent network speeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 months ago
Let's go ahead and make that configuration change then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
6 months ago
I think option D is the best solution for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
6 months ago
Agreed, that should help distribute the load evenly and improve network speeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
6 months ago
I think we should go with option D and configure LACP on all the network interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giovanna
7 months ago
I think the consultant should configure load balancing on the virtual switch for both 10G and 25G interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77