Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the correct answer

A system engineer designing a smart-home system is working with three analysts using specialized computational tools to evaluate energy consumption, waste production, and reliability of the system The team is soliciting a recommendation for an approach that achieves the following

(1) Analysis models should Incorporate design details necessary for evaluation

(2) Analysis models should be easily adaptable for different types of smart-home systems

Which recommendation would be most effective from a MBSE perspective'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rolande
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go, no doubt. Gotta love that MBSE goodness. Although, I'm curious to see what kind of wacky smart-home systems these analysts are evaluating. Bet they've got some fun stories to share!
upvoted 0 times
Angella
2 months ago
I wonder what kind of smart-home systems these analysts are working on. Must be interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
2 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the most effective recommendation from a MBSE perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go, no doubt. Gotta love that MBSE goodness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
3 months ago
I think option D could also work well, with the dependency relations between design specifications and analysis packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
3 months ago
I prefer option B, as it focuses on high-level design specifications which can be consulted by analysts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
3 months ago
Haha, leave it to the system engineers to come up with an overly complex solution. I'd just go with option B - keep it simple and let the analysts do their thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
3 months ago
I agree with Reynalda, option A seems to be the most effective from a MBSE perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
3 months ago
I think option A sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
3 months ago
I agree, D is the way to go. The dependency relations between the design and the analysis models is key for ensuring the evaluation criteria are directly tied to the system design.
upvoted 0 times
Carrol
1 months ago
Yes, D is the way to go. The dependency relations will help maintain consistency between the design and analysis models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
Agreed, D seems like the most logical approach. It establishes a direct link between the design details and the evaluation criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
2 months ago
I think D is the most effective choice too. It ensures a clear connection between the design specifications and the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 months ago
D is definitely the best option. The dependency relations are crucial for linking the design and analysis models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
2 months ago
I think D is the most effective choice too. It's important to have that direct link between design and analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
D is definitely the best option. The dependency relations will make sure everything is connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joseph
3 months ago
Option D seems like the most comprehensive approach. Having a central SysML model that links the design specifications to the different analysis packages would definitely help with maintaining consistency and adaptability.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
3 months ago
I agree, having a central SysML model linking design specifications to analysis packages would be very helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
3 months ago
Option D seems like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77