Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the coned answer

What is the best way to ensure that a shared model has consistently-represented elements and diagrams?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alishia
2 months ago
Ooh, I bet the person who wrote option D has a love for complicated enterprise-level solutions. But B is the way to go, keep it simple, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Darnell
26 days ago
Let's not overcomplicate things, sticking to modeling conventions and standards is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
29 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option D with domain stereotypes is a solid choice for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
1 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple with modeling conventions and standards is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
1 months ago
I think option A could also work well if the standard libraries are well-maintained.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leoma
2 months ago
C) packages that map one-for-one to components? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Katina
1 months ago
C) packages that map one-for-one to components? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 months ago
B) modeling conventions and standards
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
1 months ago
A) Implementation of standard libraries
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
2 months ago
D) domain stereotypes in a configuration control system? Sounds like a lot of bureaucratic overhead to me. B is the simpler and more effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
Hobert
1 months ago
D seems like it could be too complicated for what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
I think A could also work well if implemented correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
2 months ago
I agree, B is definitely the simpler option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roselle
2 months ago
I agree, B is the correct answer. Establishing and following modeling standards is crucial for maintaining a coherent shared model.
upvoted 0 times
Olga
29 days ago
Definitely, it's important for clear communication and understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
30 days ago
Agreed, it helps ensure consistency in the shared model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
1 months ago
Yes, modeling conventions and standards are essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
1 months ago
I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chandra
3 months ago
I believe domain stereotypes maintained in a configuration control system (D) is also important for ensuring consistency in shared models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
3 months ago
I agree with Melvin. Implementing standard libraries (A) may not always ensure consistency in shared models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
3 months ago
B) modeling conventions and standards is the way to go. Consistency is key for a shared model!
upvoted 0 times
Marlon
3 months ago
A) Implementation of standard libraries can also help maintain consistently-represented elements and diagrams in a shared model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
B) modeling conventions and standards is definitely the best way to ensure consistency in a shared model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melvin
3 months ago
I think the best way is to use modeling conventions and standards (B). It helps in maintaining consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77