Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Topic 2 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 2
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 Questions]

Choose the correct answer

An engineer using SysML modeling tool B imports an XMI die produced by SysML modeling tool A (containing a complete model) and makes changes to the model

What is the best way XMI provides to introduce the changes back to the original model in the original tool (Tool A)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Merilyn
2 months ago
Option A is the clear winner here. Why import the whole model when you can just send the updates? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
upvoted 0 times
Kiera
25 days ago
Option A is the clear winner here. Why import the whole model when you can just send the updates? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 months ago
B) Produce a special XMI file expressing the differences from the original XMI and import it into Tool A
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
1 months ago
A) Export only the modified and new elements to XMI and import it to Tool A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aileen
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Partitioning the models and exchanging only the changed parts seems like the most organized approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
I'm going with option D. Importing the entire model and using the tool's diff/merge utility seems like the safest way to ensure no conflicts or issues.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
1 months ago
I agree with option D, it's better to import the entire model to avoid any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 months ago
I think option A might be quicker and easier, just exporting the modified elements and importing them back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 months ago
I'm going with option D. Importing the entire model and using the tool's diff/merge utility seems like the safest way to ensure no conflicts or issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitney
2 months ago
I think partitioning the models and exchanging parts is the most accurate way to introduce changes back to the original model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe producing a special XMI file expressing the differences is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
2 months ago
I think the best way is to export only the modified elements to XMI and import it back to Tool A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
3 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea to me. Using a special XMI file to express the differences could help keep the original model intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
3 months ago
I think option A is the best way to introduce the changes back to the original model. Exporting only the modified and new elements seems more efficient than importing the entire model.
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
2 months ago
Option D could be useful too. Importing the entire model back as a separate copy and using the tool's diff/merge utility seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option C also sounds interesting. Partitioning the models and exchanging parts could be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
But what about option B? Producing a special XMI file expressing the differences could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
2 months ago
I think option A is the best way to introduce the changes back to the original model. Exporting only the modified and new elements seems more efficient than importing the entire model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77