Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

OMG Exam OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Topic 7 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 7
[All OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer.

Given the following diagram:

Which message ordering is valid?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jacquelyne at Sep 15, 2024, 08:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMG-OCSMP-MBI300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Barb
6 months ago
Ah, the old 'reuse or reinvent the wheel' dilemma. C is the clear winner here. Why complicate things when you can just reference the existing pattern?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
6 months ago
C is definitely the way to go. Who has time to create a whole separate sequence diagram just for a reused pattern? Not me!
upvoted 0 times
Arlean
5 months ago
I think that could work too, but C seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
5 months ago
A) an Interaction use referencing an interaction defined on a separate sequence diagram
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
5 months ago
I agree, it's much more efficient that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
6 months ago
C) the call interaction operator with an operand referring to the reusable Interaction defined elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B) an interaction template construct could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
6 months ago
I agree with Cherry, using an Interaction use seems like the most efficient way to represent highly reused patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) an Interaction use referencing an interaction defined on a separate sequence diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
6 months ago
B sounds like a good option too, but C seems more specific and straightforward for representing reusable interactions.
upvoted 0 times
Gretchen
6 months ago
D) an activation on the referring sequence diagram allocated to another activation on the referenced diagram
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
6 months ago
C) the call interaction operator with an operand referring to the reusable Interaction defined elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
6 months ago
B) an interaction template construct that is instantiated from the referring sequence diagram
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
6 months ago
A) an Interaction use referencing an interaction defined on a separate sequence diagram
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
7 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. The call interaction operator with an operand referring to the reusable Interaction defined elsewhere seems like the most efficient way to represent highly reused patterns of interaction on sequence diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
6 months ago
C) the call interaction operator with an operand referring to the reusable Interaction defined elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
6 months ago
A) an Interaction use referencing an interaction defined on a separate sequence diagram
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77